Comment and Opinion
Ynet: Coverage of Israel should be accurate and impartial, but it’s not, by Eytan Gilboa
On August 2, 1982, during the First Lebanon War, the front pages of the world’s leading newspapers featured a photograph of a Lebanese baby bandaged head to foot. The caption under the photograph read: “A baby who lost both arms and was severely burned as the result of a bomb dropped by an Israeli airplane.”
At a meeting in Washington, then-US secretary of state George Shultz showed the picture to his Israeli counterpart at the time, Yitzhak Shamir, and berated him, saying: “The symbol of this war is a baby whose arms have been amputated.”
The image had a direct impact on the decision-makers, but the circumstances of the photograph and the caption were incorrect. The baby didn’t lose its arms; it was lightly injured by a shell fired by the Palestine Liberation Organization.
The Western media’s professional and ethical failure in their coverage of the murderous terror attack at the Har Nof synagogue was not a one-off slip. We are dealing instead with an ongoing and shameful phenomenon of misleading and slanted photos, captions and reports about Israel and the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, even among the most renowned media outlets that purportedly hold themselves to high professional standards.
Read the article in full at Ynet.