The Guardian suggests that differences between the White House and State Department lay behind the postponing of a UN Security Council draft resolution yesterday. “The UN draft resolution, drafted by the United Arab Emirates, had been changed on Tuesday in an effort to avoid a third US veto since the conflict began more than two months ago. Instead of calling for an ‘urgent and sustainable cessation of hostilities,’ the amended text referred to ‘the urgent suspension of hostilities to allow safe and unhindered humanitarian access, and for urgent steps towards a sustainable cessation of hostilities’. According to diplomatic sources, the US mission in New York believed it had negotiated a text that it could at least abstain on, but when Washington was consulted, new objections were raised, with the White House reportedly taking a more pro-Israel line than the state department.”

The Daily Mail reports that former UK Prime Minister Tony Blair is set to meet with Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu to discuss the war, according to Andrew Mitchell, the minister for development and Africa, speaking in the Commons on Tuesday.

The Telegraph features a story saying that Israeli troops fighting in the Gaza Strip have been infected by drug-resistant pathogens. The infections have occurred mainly in limb injuries and include highly resistant bacterial strains of Klebsiella and Escherichia coli, and Aspergillus fungi. “In all hospitals it is reported that soldiers have returned from the battlefield with resistant infections,” said Prof Galia Rahav, Chairman of the AID. She added: “The contact with the soil and mud there causes exposure to such resistant bacteria, and also to mould.”

The Telegraph reports that President Biden is considering missile strikes against the Houthis in Yemen, after the Iran-backed group’s multiple acts of aggression against Israeli and US targets and international shipping in the Red Sea. “While some US military officials believe a direct strike against Houthi rebels is the only way to prevent the shutdown of the shipping lane,” it writes, “other Pentagon advisers are thought to have warned it would inflame tensions with Iran, which backs the Houthis as well as Hamas. Pentagon officials are also reportedly growing concerned about the cost of their defensive operation in the Red Sea.”

The Independent features the death of a 17-day-old baby girl in an air strike in the Gaza Strip.

The Financial Times reports Israel’s President Herzog telling foreign diplomats yesterday that “Israel is ready for another humanitarian pause and additional humanitarian aid [into Gaza] in order to enable the release of hostages.” Herzog said the responsibility for a new agreement “lies fully with [Hamas leader Yahya] Sinwar and the leadership of Hamas”.

An Independent editorial writes that “a breakthrough in the Israel-Hamas war is necessary for humanitarian and economic reasons.”

In The Times, Daniel Finkelstein relates to his own recent article in which, as a supporter of Israel, he made a number of concessions to the pro-Palestinian viewpoint. “I had hoped… that this article would prompt matching concessions by those campaigning for Palestinian rights. I have been disappointed… How can supporters of Palestinian rights fail to see that this stance, this complete failure to see Israel’s case, simply won’t do? Is no one willing to show the courage to acknowledge that there are two sides to this story?”

The Daily Mail reports yesterday’s anti-Israel protest in Washington DC, in which police arrested more than 60 protesters for storming into the historic Rotunda in the US Capitol.

The Daily Mail features an incident in which Israeli troops deliberately fired an artillery cannon over the head of a female soldier. Footage shows the young woman standing in front of the self-propelled howitzer as it fires off a round, sending her stumbling to the ground. “The incident… is severe and completely deviates from the IDF’s safety regulations,” an IDF spokesperson said. “An in-depth investigation into the matter will be held as soon as possible, and punishments will be in order. No one was hurt in the incident.”

The Express writes on tensions on Israel’s norther border. It quotes IDF spokesperson Lieutenant Colonel Jonathan Conricus saying “Hezbollah, who as everybody knows is a proxy of Iran, is dangerously dragging Lebanon into an unnecessary war that could have potentially devastating consequences for the state of Lebanon and for the people of Lebanon. And it is a war that I think neither Lebanon nor Israel deserves to be fighting.”

The Independent reports UK Home Secretary James Cleverly warning Christmas shoppers to remain vigilant amid concerns over potential terror attacks. “Police figures last month revealed that between October 7 and 25, following the Hamas attack on Israel, the anti-terror hotline received around 1,350 reports, more than twice the number of contacts compared to the same period last year.”

The Daily Mail profiles female members of Israel’s border guard unit who responded on October 7^th. “We schooled the other units that day,” says one. “We knew it better than them and did our jobs faster. Maybe they were faster to get there but we did the job a lot better.”

The International Business Times reports that a hacker organisation, Gonjeshke Darande, has claimed a cyberattack that forced Iran to shut down 70 per cent of its gas stations. “While Israel has kept to its ‘ambiguity policy’, correspondents and personnel belonging to the Israeli Defence Forces (IDF) have strongly alluded to the cyberattack on the Iranian steel plant, being at the hands of Israel’s Military Intelligence’s Unit 8200. In statements written in Persian and English, the cyber-attackers explained: ‘This cyberattack comes in response to the aggression of the Islamic Republic and its proxies in the region.’”

Yediot Ahronot publishes a front page story “We Lost Contact with Hamami; The Mission: To Get Alon Back Home” which focuses on the six year old son of Colonel Asaf Hamami, Alon, who spent October 6 with his father on base to celebrate his birthday. On the morning of 7 October, as Asaf Hamami was killed fighting Hamas terrorists on Kibbutz Nirim and his body taken to Gaza, and as the base was under attack, the IDF managed to return his son Alon to his mother in Kiryat Ono.

In Haaretz, Amos Harel writes that the Israeli military plans to change the nature of Gaza warfare within a month, but Netanyahu may have other plans. “Among Israel’s political and military leadership, there is a growing understanding that the war in Gaza will be transitioning to its next stage over the course of the next month. Washington’s recommendation is that the change include the establishment of a buffer zone on the Gaza border (and perhaps also between the enclave’s northern and southern halves), a reduction in some reserve forces and a switch to division-level forays into the enclave from the extensive, slow and destructive ground maneuvers now being conducted by four divisions inside Gaza…However, there remains a major political obstacle to moving to the next stage, namely Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s fear that his coalition will collapse under pressure from an angry right wing.”

Maariv reports that in sifting through the intelligence material that was gathered in the Gaza Strip, officials came across a number of videos featuring senior Hamas commander, Mohammed Deif, walking with a limp in what indicates Deif’s medical condition is far better than Israeli officials believed it to be after repeated attempts on his life. “The fact that Deif is alive, functional and in relatively good physical shape—he is able to walk and function independently—completely contradicts the detailed Israeli intelligence assessments about his physical condition from recent years.”

An opinion piece in Israel Hayom calls for Netanyahu to announce his date of resignation. “The moment that Netanyahu concedes his future political survival and stops focusing on that while the war is underway, we will get a ‘cleaner’ and more authentic performance from him as leader in the difficult military and diplomatic war we are in the midst of and which still awaits us, a war that is probably far from over.” Nadav Shragai argues that “the moment he and we stop dealing with Netanyahu’s political survival, his positions will be judged on their own merits, not in light of the fact they are his views. Be that whether we are talking about justifiably opposing a Palestinian state that would be an existential threat, or be that whether we are talking about the ongoing settlement enterprise in Judea and Samaria, which is ever-so vital for and Zionism and security, or be it that we are talking about changes, which are also very necessary, to the judiciary. The idea will be separated—at long last—from the man. Today, they are all one and the same; [once he announces his intention to resign] the worldview and the positions will be at the centre, not Netanyahu. We will finally be able to judge things on their merits, not according to the individual and the benefit or harm they do to him.”

Haaretz publish an interview with British comedian David Baddiel. Until two months ago, he never wanted to talk about Israel. When he got up on stage, he spoke of his Jewish identity but never about the Jewish state. If he was shown an article about Israel, for him it may as well have been Argentina. He argued that when he speaks of antisemitism and people answer him “But what about Israel?” – that itself is an expression of antisemitism. In short, Baddiel wanted Israel to play no part in his story. Then came October 7.” Since then “Baddiel, 59, has been using his X (Twitter) account, which has some 900,000 followers, to protest what he views as the progressive left’s erasure of the pain and suffering endured by Israeli Jews that day. He highlights antisemitic reactions to the Hamas massacre, explaining why they are in fact antisemitic and not merely anti-Israel.”

Yediot Ahronot, Maariv and Israel Hayom report on an exchange between Chief of Staff Halevi and Minister Ben Gvir. It relates to an incident in which IDF soldiers who seized control of a mosque in Jenin and recited the “Hear O Israel” prayer over its loudspeaker system. In the course of the security cabinet meeting that was held on Monday, the chief of staff commented on the incident in the context of a broader briefing he gave to the ministers, and described it as “improper.” Ben Gvir interjected: “I want to know that the soldiers who said ‘Hear O Israel’ in the mosque are to be restored to active duty,” he demanded. “Had you taken them quietly aside, dealt with the issue quietly, at most given them a bit of a dressing down—admittedly, I don’t think that that is [the] right [thing to do]—but that would be understandable. But the moment you went public with this in the media and said you’d suspended the soldiers—that is certainly an issue for the security cabinet. That’s a question of policy, and you’re also deterring other soldiers. It would be terrible if they aren’t returned to service, terrible.” The chief of staff said to Ben Gvir: “You’re wrong. I’ll decide what is ethical and what isn’t ethical in the military. Don’t threaten me.” Prime Minister Netanyahu interceded at that point and ended the exchange, but things heated up once again after he stepped out of the room. During the meeting, the chief of staff also commented on the IDF’s efforts to either capture or kill Hamas leader in Gaza Yahya Sinwar, and told the security cabinet ministers: “The Americans killed the arch-terrorist Osama bin Laden only ten years after the September 11 terror attacks. The best people here are working on this. It’ll take far less [time].”

Commenting in Maariv, Ben Caspit writes that “the security cabinet is a threat to Israel’s security. Long meetings that last for hours on end and which are held exclusively in order to be able to leak material and quotes that might make headlines. That is what prompted the assault on the chief of staff and other high-ranking IDF officers with bared bayonets and the mud-slinging: the ministers’ pursuit of the next headline on Twitter, on websites and in the broadcast media.”

In similar vein in Israel Hayom, Yoav Limor bemoans “a world of opposites: A convicted serial criminal [Ben Gvir] who did not serve a single minute in the IDF and who has spent most of his adult life as a GSS [Shin Bet] person of interest and representing [as a lawyer] people who interfered with the security forces doing their jobs is now teaches ethics and security to a person who has dedicated his life to the security of this country [Halevi]. He has the gall to do so at a moment that might be the toughest one the country has ever experienced, a moment at which the future of the nation literally rests on the shoulders of the chief of staff, who was forced to take time to listen to the inanities that were levelled at him by the most embarrassing minister in the history of this country… Even more insulting is the knowledge that at the end of this war, and regardless of the outcome, Halevi is going to resign. He will take responsibility for the October 7 failure and will go home, whereas Ben Gvir will remain and will continue to undermine democracy and security.”