What’s happened: A publicity stunt by a far-right Member of Knesset in a West Bank village sparked outrage across the Israeli political spectrum.
- Tzvi Sukkot, MK from the Religious Zionism Party led by Bezalel Smotrich, entered the Palestinian village of Madama in the northern West Bank early yesterday morning and filmed himself taking a sledgehammer to a monument erected in the town to commemorate “martyrs” in the Palestinian fight against Israel.
- Israeli media reported that the monument commemorated two Palestinians killed in the Second Intifada, including one who died carrying out a suicide bombing. Arab media reported that the monument also listed names of Palestinians killed in battles with Israel going as far back as the Battle of Karameh in Jordan in 1968.
- Condemnation of Sukkot’s act was particularly sharp from the IDF itself, which claimed that it had been misled by the MK as to the intentions of his tour in the northern West Bank, which it had agreed to secure.
- Opposition figures condemned Sukkot’s act as a needless provocation in an already tense West Bank and as a cynical election ploy.
- “The chaos government is damaging Israeli security and Israel’s standing in the world in order to get a few views on TikTok,” said Together Party chairman and former Prime Minister Naftali Bennet. “Terrorism needs to be fought with action, not with cheap provocations. Smotrich and Sukkot weren’t satisfied with being the architects of the draft-dodging bill and abandoning IDF soldiers on their own beneath the stretcher. Now they are also undermining their missions and endangering their lives for election videos.”
- Yashar Party chair Gadi Eisenkott called Sukkot’s actions “a disgrace for someone who presumes to represent a public and to be a leader,” adding that he “lied and deceived the IDF and its commanders, damaged security and stained the entire State of Israel.”
- Prime Minister Netanyahu also criticised Sukkot in a statement yesterday, saying that “taking the law into one’s own hands, particularly by public figures, is unacceptable and hinders the IDF from focusing on its missions of combating terror and incitement.”
Context: Much of the condemnation of Sukkot in Israel alluded to the negative attention his actions were garnering abroad, though in reality the international media took little note of the event.
- At the same time, and more ominously, Sukkot’s destruction of a monument inside a Palestinian village comes on a backdrop of extremely high tensions in the West Bank, with senior figures in the IDF and the Shin Bet warning both the government, and in anonymous leaks, the public in general, of an explosive situation brewing in the West Bank.
- A briefing for the Government by IDF Chief of General Staff Eyal Zamir about the situation in the West Bank has been at the centre of competing leaks from political and military figures in Israel.
- At the briefing, the army reportedly warned the Government that provocative actions by leading MK’s of the two far-right parties in the coalition were seen as “agitating the Palestinians to spark a third intifada before the election,” according to a media report based on leaks from senior military figures.
- The IDF’s presentation to the Government included data pointing to a drop in Palestinian terrorism in the West Bank and a parallel rise in “Jewish nationalist crime,” according to the same media report.
- The challenge to stem Jewish extremism is hampered by the lack of tools available. As a rule, the military does not collect intelligence against its own citizens. Defence Minister Katz removed their ability to apply administrative detention against known provocateurs, whilst the army itself is stretched across numerous fronts with the better trained soldiers serving elsewhere. All this compounded by the overall limit of available manpower.
- The IDF has recently moved a combat brigade from Gaza to the West Bank in an effort to clamp down the violence there, and it may soon need to move forces from southern Lebanon into the West Bank too. This is happening as Israel is preparing for the High Holidays, a time when soldiers normally expect to spend time at home rather than increasing the burden of service in the last three years.
- A high-ranking delegation of US officials visiting Israel last week raised the issue repeatedly with their Israeli counterparts as well. The US officials, all quoted anonymously, expressed frustration regarding acts of violence by settlers in the West Bank, noting that the constant drumbeat of such acts was costing Israel support in the US.
- Beyond that issue, however, was a mounting concern that regardless of the intentions of the Israeli Government or the Palestinian Authority, an act of violence from one side or the other could spark a major escalation that would look more like the violent years of the Second Intifada and less like the strained containment of the last five years, which has somehow managed to keep the West Bank from exploding, even in the aftermath of the October 7 massacre and the deadly war in Gaza.
- On October 7 itself, Hamas hoped to ignite violence in the West Bank, and one of its thwarted goals on that deadly day were for its Nukhba forces invading Israel from Gaza to link up with its much less well-armed cells in the West Bank.
- Hamas’s infrastructure in the West Bank has never recovered from the damage it sustained in the massive IDF offensives in 2002 following a deadly wave of suicide bombings in Israel cities. Since that time, the IDF has operated freely even in areas under the control of the Palestinian Authority. In recent years, it has even done so with the cooperation of the Palestinian Authority itself as it has sought to avoid being violently deposed by Hamas, as happened to it in Gaza in 2007.
- The brewing storm in the West Bank is also at the heart of a new initiative due to be announced UK Prime Minister Andy Burnham in the coming days. The Times is reporting this morning that Burnham’s Government will soon announce “robust” measures against Israel including sanctions on individuals connected with settler violence and a possible ban on trade with Israeli settlements.
- The announced measures come as various European and other Western countries coordinate responses to the Israeli building tenders in E1, a settlement project linking Jerusalem to Maaleh Adumim that is widely, though falsely, criticised as threatening the territorial contiguity of a future Palestinian state (despite such a state already recognised as existing according to official UK Government policy).
- It is not clear how such a trade ban could be implemented without harming trade with Israeli businesses in general. While that may be the intention of some of the Labour Party activists pushing for such a move, it is not clear if that is really in line with Government policy or UK national interest.
- Other critics, including inside the Labour Party, point out that the rumoured announcement, coming as Israel is in the middle of an election campaign, can only serve to strengthen rightist and far-right parties as they face an otherwise tough domestic political environment.
- Sukkot’s Religious Zionism Party teeters above the electoral threshold in its competition with the more adroit attention-grabbing antics of the other far-right party in the running, Itamar Ben-Gvir’s Otzma Yehudit.
- The Battle of Karameh was an unsuccessful Israeli incursion into Jordan in 1968 targeting the nascent Fatah movement (and the PLO more broadly) which ended with substantial losses for the IDF (28 killed), the PLO (156 killed), and the Jordanian forces (84 killed) who intervened to block the IDF advance.
Looking ahead: An explosion of violence in the West Bank has been the dog that didn’t bark of the past four years in the Israeli-Palestinian arena.
- In the three years before October 7, and even more so in the three years since, observers from all sides and with various underlying positions on the conflict have been sure that it was about to explode. So far, these predictions have not come to pass, but that is not guarantee for future performance.



