LATEST

Syria

Key background
  • Following Israel’s establishment in 1948, Syria – along with other hostile neighbours – immediately declared war. Since then, the two countries have been in a state of belligerent hostility.
  • In the lead up to the 1967 Six Day War – during which Israel captured the strategically located Golan Heights – Syria had fired mortars and attacked Israeli farmers in northern Israel. Six years later, Syria (along with Egypt in the south) launched a surprise attack in what became the Yom Kippur War. After several days of intense fighting, Israel ultimately regained positions won in 1967. In 1974, US diplomatic efforts established the armistice line that was monitored by UNDOF (UN Disengagement Observer Force).
  • For close to 50 years since 1974 this was Israel’s quietest frontier, and in 1981, the government asserted Israeli civil administration over the territory, effectively annexing it. In 2007 Israel destroyed a Syrian site aiming to produce nuclear weapons.
  • During the Syrian civil war, as Iran tried to militarily entrench itself in Syria, use the country as a smuggling route for advanced weapons for Hezbollah, and set up Iranian proxies on the Syrian Golan, Israel launched its ‘Campaign between the wars’ to disrupt these activities.
  • In March 2019, the Trump administration reversed decades of US policy by formally recognizing Israel’s annexation of the Golan Heights.
  • Since the fall of the Assad regime in December 2024, Israel has taken over positions in the former UN controlled demilitarised zone, including the strategic high point on Mount Hermon. Israel has also vowed to protect the Druze of southern Syria.
The Syrian opposition flag in Majdal Shams, in the Golan Heights, December 8, 2024.
The Syrian opposition flag in Majdal Shams, in the Golan Heights, December 8, 2024. Photo by Michael Giladi/Flash90

Updated May 16, 2025

Israel and Syria in the post-Assad world

New BICOM research: Six months after the fall of the Assad regime, Israel faces a new and volatile reality on its border with . BICOM’s latest paper explores the post-Assad landscape, from Israel’s posture to the emerging Druze alliance and the changing regional axes of power.

  1. In the six months since the Assad regime’s collapse, Israel has adopted a forward-leaning posture in – militarily, politically, and diplomatically. Despite initial satisfaction at Assad’s removal, Israel has not welcomed his successor, Ahmed al-Sharaa, who previously led the jihadist Nusra Front and is viewed with deep suspicion in Israeli security circles.
  2. On the day the regime fell, the IDF moved decisively to take full control of the long-standing buffer zone once patrolled by UNDOF, along with several strategic sites just inside Syrian territory. This step was taken to ensure that southwestern does not become, like southern Lebanon or post-Qaddafi Libya, a haven for hostile militias and jihadist operating under the cover of state collapse.
  3. After Assad’s fall, Syrian Druze began seeking Israeli protection following jihadist attacks and civil unrest. Cross-border Druze visits and religious pilgrimages have resumed, symbolising a growing informal alliance. Nevertheless, for Syrian Druze, overt alignment with Israel remains fraught with risk. Historical precedent from Lebanon offers cautionary lessons about the long-term viability of alliances with Israel for minority groups in the region.
  4. Israeli strategy is anchored in one central imperative: preventing the emergence of jihadist-controlled zones along its borders. Past experience with Hezbollah and Hamas has shown that it is easier to prevent the consolidation of such actors than to dislodge them once entrenched.
  5. Israel is also committed to protecting the Druze minority and, where possible, maintaining its longstanding alliance with the Kurds as well. This is a moral commitment that Israel needs for its own regional credibility, as well as a minimal condition of maintaining its rule in the Golan.
  6. The rise of al-Sharaa has opened the door for the Turkish-Qatari axis to expand directly into Syria. Trump’s overture, aligned with Qatari and Turkish interests, does not necessarily conflict with Israeli actions on the ground – in fact, it tacitly acknowledged and accepted Israel’s assertive military presence, including in the buffer zone and in support of the Druze.

May 8, 2025

Are Israel and Syria holding indirect talks?

Druze from Syria enter Israel
Druze from Syria enter Israel on the occasion of Nabi Shuaib's holiday, at Majdal Shams, April 25, 2025. Photo by Jamal Awad/Flash90 *** Local Caption *** דרוזים סוריה נכנסים ישראל חג נבי שועייב דרוזי גבול

Diplomatic speculation: During a visit to France, Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa (Mohammed Abu al-Jolani) confirmed that was holding indirect negotiations with Israel. 

  • It followed a report by Reuters that the UAE has set up a backchannel for talks focused on security, intelligence matters and confidence-building between the two states.
  • Asked about that report during a press conference in Paris, Sharaa responded: “There are indirect negotiations taking place via mediators to calm the situation…We talk to all states that are in communication with the Israeli side to pressure them to stop interfering in ‘s affairs and violating its airspace and striking some of its installations.”
  • An intelligence source said UAE security officials, Syrian intelligence officials and former Israeli intelligence officials were involved in the mechanism, among others. One source described the effort as focused on “technical matters,” and said there was no limit to what may eventually be discussed. A senior Syrian security source told Reuters that the UAE-based backchannel was limited strictly to security-related issues, focusing on several counterterrorism files.
  • Israel Hayom quotes Western diplomatic sources who believe that various channels of communication exist between the countries in the region. It quotes security expert saying, “It is very important to study the messages from at this time of regime change,” adding “At this stage, no final decisions have been made about the response to these changes.” 
  • The backchannel with Israel was reportedly established a few days after Sharaa met with UAE President Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan last month.
  • UAE Assistant Foreign Minister for Political Affairs and Foreign Minister’s Envoy told Reuters that “the claim that the UAE is ‘mediating secret talks’ between Syria and Israel is categorically false, adding that the UAE is not part of any such talks.”

Protecting the Syrian Druze: Over the last week, reports from Druze communities in southern Syria described Syrian security forces making arrests, insulting Druze religious leaders, and harassing women. There were also reports of more than 10 people killed.      

  • As a result, hundreds Israeli Druze who have served in the IDF sent a letter to the prime minister and the defence minister demanding Israel support the Druze in Syria. The letter reads: “We expect you to keep your promise of solidarity, defence, and a halt to the massacre of our fellow Druze across the border. Hundreds of soldiers are ready to volunteer immediately to fight to save our brethren. We are brothers, Jews and Druze, in our country and outside its borders.” 
  • Prime Minister Netanyahu and Defence Minister Katz issued a joint statement saying, “We will not allow [Syrian] troops to deploy south of Damascus or pose any threat to the Druze community.” 
  • The IDF Spokesperson’s Office announced that military forces were ready in southern Syria to prevent hostile elements from entering the Druze towns. 
  • Earlier this week Coordinator of Government Activities in the Territories (COGAT) Maj. Gen. Ghassan Aliyan visited southern Syria and met with leaders of the Druze community to discuss their security-related and humanitarian difficulties. The Druze representatives at the meeting presented both a humanitarian crisis and security threat from radical Islamists. 
  • Israeli helicopters reportedly dropped equipment and supplies in Syria last week and evacuated injured Druze to hospitals in Israel.  

Context: Israel officials and analysts are still trying to determine the true nature of new Syrian regime.

  • The Syrian President’s visit to Paris (his first ever visit to a European country) and his meeting with President Macron mark an incredible turnaround for someone who spent most of his adult life as jihadist, affiliated with Al-Qaeda.  He also remains on the US list of wanted terrorists and has a 10 million dollar bounty on his head.
  • The Syrian motivation for diplomatic talks stems from the desire of the new regime to lift the sanctions on it and to repair the country’s international status. Syria likely wants international recognition as part of a process of normalisation with the West.   
  • Israel’s strategic interests in southern Syria include:
    • Keep jihadist forces away from its border. 
    • Protecting the Druze minority and, where possible, maintaining its longstanding alliance with the Kurds as well. This constitutes a moral commitment that Israel needs for its own regional credibility, as well as a minimal condition of maintaining its rule in the Golan. But much more than that, it is important for domestic Israeli politics. The Druze community has made an outsize contribution to Israeli security, in this war no less than in previous ones, and it constitutes a cohesive and focused pressure group that the Israeli leadership cannot just ignore, particularly on an issue that is now so salient for the community.
  • The Israeli Air Force strikes on Syrian territory last weekend were intended to destroy what remains of weapons systems left over from Assad’s army that could be used against Israel; and to send a message to Syria’s new ruler against continuing the murderous clashes that they started with the Druze. 
  • One of those strikes was 500 metres from the presidential palace in Damascus. 
  • Israel has no interest in continuously operating in Syrian territory. It appears that the IDF prefers to accumulate a bank of targets and attack them in one go when there is appropriate opportunity. 
  • The new Syrian regime has two main objections to the Druze:
    • Religious – for Sunni jihadists, the Druze are considered infidels 
    • Political – the Druze in Syria have a degree of autonomy in the area of Al-Suwayda and this poses a challenge to the new central government. This is a similar situation to the Kurds in the northeast and the Alawites in western Syria. 

Looking ahead: Israel is expected to maintain control of a security zone inside southern Syria adjacent to the Israeli border.

  • It is also expected to continue to provide to Syrian Druze and explore the possibility of allowing a limited number to work inside Israel. 
  • The rhetoric from the new Syrian regime towards Israel has been surprisingly moderate, insisting it does not want any military entanglement with Israel. At the same time, Israel is concerned that due to the close relations between Jolani and Turkish President Erdogan, Turkey could increase its influence in the country, including in some military sensitive areas.

April 4, 2025

Israel strikes in Syria and Lebanon

Israel Air Force fighter jet F-15, at the Tel Nor airforce base. January 01, 2024. Photo by Moshe Shai/FLASH90 *** Local Caption *** îèåñ ÷øá F 15 çéì àåéø

On Wednesday evening, the IDF launched extensive airstrikes on targets in Hama and Damascus in , which it later confirmed were “military capabilities” and “military infrastructure sites.”

  • Commenting on the strikes yesterday, Defence Minister  Israel Katz said “The air force’s activity yesterday near the airports in T4 [an airbase near Homs], Hama, and the Damascus area sends a clear message and serves as a warning for the future…I warn Syrian leader Jolani: If you allow hostile forces to enter and threaten Israeli security interests, you will pay a heavy price.”
  • Turkey, which is widely viewed as the new Syrian government’s patron state responded by condemning the Israeli strikes, demanding Israel withdraw from the Syrian territory it occupies, and accused it of becoming “the greatest threat to regional security…[and a] strategic destabiliser, causing chaos and feeding terrorism.”
  • Israeli Foreign Minister, Gideon Saar, responded by saying that Turkey was playing a “negative role” in , and that “they are doing their utmost to have Syria as a Turkish protectorate. It’s clear that is their intention”.
  • In southern Syia, the IDF says it eliminated several gunmen after coming under attack during an operation to confiscate weaponry and dismantle terrorist infrastructure in the village of Tasil, located eight miles north of the Israeli border.
  • This was the second shooting incident in the southern Syria security zone this week.
  • Overnight the Israeli Air Force struck once more in Lebanon, destroying targets associated with both Hezbollah and Hamas. Yesterday, the IDF said it “struck a Hezbollah terrorist who operated in the area of Aalma El Chaeb in southern Lebanon”. The IDF has also confirmed that the strike on the Lebanese city of Sidon, targeting Hassan Farhat, a local Hamas commander responsible for numerous attacks against Israel, one of which killed a soldier during a rocket strike on the city of Tzfat in February 2024.

March 11, 2025

Israel targets military assets in southern Syria

The Chief of the General Staff, LTG Eyal Zamir, visited the Area of Separation in Syria
The Chief of the General Staff, LTG Eyal Zamir, visited the Area of Separation in Syria on March 9, 2025. Photo credit: IDF Spokesperson’s Office

11/03/2025

What’s happened: Israeli Air Force jets conducted air strikes in southern last night.

  • The IDF Spokesperson’s Office announced that the planes “struck radars and detection assets used for constructing aerial intelligence assessments in southern .”
  • The IDF added that “command positions and military sites containing weapons and military equipment belonging to the Syrian Regime in southern were [also] struck.”
  • According to Syrian reports, there were at least 41 airstrikes, making this the largest attack in the last two months.
  • On Sunday the new IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Zamir, visited troops inside Syria and conducted a situational assessment. He reviewed their deployment in the area of the northeastern Israeli  border and was briefed about the developments inside Syrian territory. Zamir was also presented with anticipated possible developments and the planned reactions.
  • Yesterday saw the new Syrian President announce an agreement with the commander of the Kurdish forces in Syria (SDF) to integrate the Kurds into Syrian institutions and the Syrian army.
  • This development followed the regime’s attacks against Alawites in western Syria over the weekend, with reports of hundreds of civilians killed.
  • The IDF has not changed its deployment in Syria, and does not intend to intervene in domestic Syrian affairs. 

Context: The attacks against the Alawites by regime supporters has sharpened Israeli concerns that they are dangerous recalcitrant Jihadis.

  • The current Israeli assessment is that the new regime, led by Ahmed Hussein al-Sharaa (also known as Abu Mohammad al-Julani) has not yet secured full control of Syria after seizing power, and is still facing numerous challenges.
  • Yesterday, Israeli Foreign Minister Saar related to the killings saying, “They were jihadists and remain jihadists, even if some of their leaders have donned suits.” He called for the international community to “come to its senses… it must raise its voice against the barbaric murder of civilians, against the pure evil of jihadists.”
  • In hindsight, there is further appreciation inside Israel for the significant strikes that Israel carried against the weapons of the former Assad regime that were estimated to have destroyed 80% the Syrian army’s main capabilities.
  • Those strikes in December 2024 were the largest military operation the IDF has ever undertaken, and one the IDF had not prepared in advance.
  • It was based on the logic that Syria possessed significant capabilities that could pose a threat were they to fall into irresponsible hands.
  • Three months later, these strikes yesterday attest to residual concern over four potential threats from Syria:
    • The new regime: although Israel may not be their current priority, once stabilised, they could pivot to attacking Israel, especially with their leader al-Sharaa having family roots in the Golan. Israeli leaders have been clear that they will not accept regime forces south of Damascus.      
    • The still possible fragmentation of Syria: and the role of ISIS affiliated Sunni Jihadis in southern Syria. Israel has already targeted armed men that approached the border area.  
    • Palestinian terror groups: including Hamas and Islamic Jihad – some of whom were released from prison after Assad fell – and who could still use Syria as a launchpad for attacks.
    • The role of Turkey: and their ambitions to set up military bases close to the Israeli border. 
  • Whilst all these threats are currently contained, Israel remains deployed in small but strategically significant positions inside southern Syria. Israel’s primary position is within the demilitarised zone established in the 1974 armistice agreement. This includes the strategic summit on Mount Hermon. Beyond that, Israel also has operational freedom of movement in what it calls a ‘security zone’, which includes some (mostly Druze) villages.  
  • Last month Prime Minister Netanyahu committed to defend the Druze of southern Syria.  

Looking ahead: Israeli leaders have said that they expect the IDF to remain in the buffer zone adjacent to the Israeli border for the foreseeable future.   

  • Israel is hoping that the US troops remain deployed in Eastern Syria, despite suggestions that Trump was to remove them.
  • Defence Minister Katz is exploring the possibility of granting Druze in southern Syria permits to work inside Israel. This could see Syrian Druze working in construction and agriculture in Druze towns on the Israeli controlled Golan.

February 25, 2025

Israel pledges to defend southern Syrian Druze

Residents in the Druze village of Majdal Shams celebrate after the rebels took over Syria, in Majdal Shams, in the Golan Heights, December 9, 2024. Photo by Chaim Goldberg/Flash90 *** Local Caption *** מלחמה סוריה ישראל מג'דל שמס חגיגות

What’s happening: In a speech on Sunday, Prime Minister Netanyahu said Israel would not allow Islamist forces who control or the new Syrian army being formed to “enter the area south of Damascus” adding that Israel demands “the complete demilitarisation of southern in the provinces of Quneitra, Deraa and Suweida from the forces of the new regime.”

  • Netanyahu also discussed the Druze community, that is located both in the Israel controlled Golan and in southern , emphasising that Israel would “not tolerate any threat to the Druze community in southern Syria.”
  • Several Druze militias that have formed in the Suwayda district of Syria announced yesterday they would be opening a joint operations headquarters to allow them to facilitate security and stability in the Jabel Druze area. Their aim is to function as an independent military force separate from the Syrian army. 
  • Defence Minister Katz said the IDF would remain in the buffer zone on the Syrian side of the Golan “for an indefinite period of time to protect our communities and thwart any threat.”
  • In related news, the IDF announced that troops continue “defensive operations” and have completed dozens of targeted raids, during which they located, confiscated, and dismantled various weapons that pose a threat to Israel. During one of the raids last week, soldiers located rifles, ammunition, and other military equipment left behind by the old Syrian regime forces. All findings were either confiscated or dismantled.
  • Netanyahu and Katz’s comments come as Syria’s transitional government has organised a national dialogue conference aimed at shaping the post-Assad future of the country.

Lebanon: In Lebanon on Sunday, tens of thousands of people, mainly from Lebanon’s Shia community, attended the funeral of former Hezbollah Secretary General Hassan Nasrallah in Beirut. Senior Hezbollah official Ali Daamoush told reporters that about 800 personalities from 65 countries would be attending.

  • Notable however was the absence of significant Lebanese political figures and those from the Arab world.
  • Nasrallah’s successor Naim Qassem delivered a speech from a remote location announcing a ‘new stage’ in the group’s battle against Israel. “We will not submit and we will not accept the continuation of our killing and occupation while we watch,”
  • IAF combat planes that flew over Beirut during the funeral Israel’s Defense Minister Katz said it was meant to “deliver a clear message: Those who threaten and attack Israel will meet the same fate.”
  • Israel also carried out several airstrikes in Lebanon, targeting Hezbollah sites containing rocket launchers and other weapons in the area of Baalbek and several additional areas in southern Lebanon.

Context: Nasrallah, who had led Hezbollah for over 30 years, was killed by Israel in late September 2024 after more than 80 bombs were dropped on the group’s main operations room.

  • While his funeral was intended by Hezbollah as a show of force and to prove it enjoys broad support within Lebanon for its resistance against Israel, the attendance (and lack of attendance) actually signified the current weakness of Hezbollah. The Lebanese government sent the labor minister – a Hezbollah representative – but President Aoun did not attend the event. During the ceremony Aoun’s office issued a statement that implicitly criticised Hezbollah decision to go to war against Israel, saying in a meeting with the Iranian delegation that “Lebanon is weary of others’ wars.”
  • One person who did attend the funeral was anti-Zionist professor David Miller who works for Iranian state-owned Press TV. Miller shared a video online of himself in Beirut.
  • The IAF jets were intended to mock Nasrallah’s legacy.  In the years before his death, Nasrallah had several times boasted that the IDF could not do as it pleased in Lebanon, and that any attack on a Lebanese or a non-Lebanese national would come with a price. 
  • The video Naim Qassem broadcast (rather than attending in person) suggests he fears for his life.
  • While Qassem announced a “new stage,” his remarks indicate Hezbollah would maintain the cautious stance it has taken since the ceasefire far. He qualified his pledge to continue “resistance” by adding the words “at the right time,” adding that Israel’s failure to uphold the agreement needed to result in the state’s intervention.
  • Iran continues to try and arm Hezbollah. Under the terms of the ceasefire agreement Israel can and will continue to monitor Hezbollah activity and maintain freedom to act if the threat is considered imminent. Recently Israel warned the control room at Beirut airport not to let an Iranian commercial airliner land as intelligence had identified it as transporting funds destined for Hezbollah. 
  • Following the ceasefire between Israel and Hezbollah Israel has now redeployed from all Lebanese villages, and all of Lebanese territory apart from five outposts close to the border. President Aoun has been quoted in Lebanese media saying, “the option of war is not helpful and we will act using diplomatic means.”
  • While Syria does not currently pose a threat to Israel, the working assumption is that internal tensions and rivalries between the religious and ideological groups might erupt at some point, as might the ingrained hatred of Israel. 
  • Israel is concerned about the establishment of anti-Israel militias near the border with Israel. Syria’s leader Al-Jolani might have no intention of attacking Israel, but it still remains to be seen how he will be able to control Syria in the medium term. Moreover, the disproportionate influence of Turkey and its President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan – who has said that the day would come when he and his troops would clash with Israel – also stokes Israeli fears of such a scenario.

Looking ahead: The proposals of the Syrian National Dialogue will be considered by a new transitional government that is set to take power on March 1.

  • The Kurdish-led Autonomous Administration of North and East Syria and other Kurdish representatives have declined participation, citing concerns over the inclusiveness and legitimacy of the conference. 

Newsletter sign-up

Please enter your information below to subscribe to our weekly newsletter and stay updated and informed.

Donate to BICOM

At BICOM, we rely on the generosity of people like you to keep our website and services running. Your donation, no matter the size, makes a real difference. Please consider supporting us today.