Operational overview: Early on Saturday morning, the Israeli Air Force (IAF) struck 20 targets in three different areas inside Iran.
- It is understood that the IAF successfully targeted Iran’s advanced long-range air-defence systems, several manufacturing sites for vital components of the Iranian ballistic missile programme, and storage sites for ballistic weapons.
- The operation is considered one of the most complex missions the IAF has ever undertaken. It involved around 140 aircraft of various types, including those for the attack itself, intelligence gathering, and contingencies for rescue missions. Over half of the crews were reservists, and four members of the flight crew were women.
- The strike was carried out in the early hours, with targets chosen to ensure no civilian casualties and only minimal military personnel losses.
- Although Israel operated independently, the strikes were closely coordinated with the US.
- As a result, Israel did not attack any nuclear or energy facilities, or symbols of the state, focusing solely on military targets.
Strategic impact: Israel has deemed this operation a success. It has significantly degraded Iran’s ballistic missile production capability, neutralised its air defences, and exposed the regime’s vulnerability to the Iranian public and the wider region.
- For three hours after Israel had disabled Iranian air-defence systems, it had the ability to target any site it wanted.
- The Iranians are believed to be reflecting on this vulnerability as they consider whether to respond.
- Israel has incapacitated Iran’s Russian-made S-300 advanced air-defence systems. As Russia requires all available systems to defend against Ukraine, Iran is unlikely to be able to replenish these defences in the near future.
- Initial estimates suggest that it could take Iran 2-3 years to reestablish capacity to build more ballistic missiles.
- Iran can no longer rely on its chief proxies, Hezbollah and Hamas, to retaliate against Israel. As a result of a year of conflict, both groups have been substantially weakened.
- Israel considers this operation as a warning to Iran. It still has a bank of targets it can strike.
- To emphasise this, IDF Chief of Staff Halevi said Sunday that the operation, “used only some of our capabilities. We can do much more. We hit strategic systems in Iran. This has great importance. And we will now see how matters develop. We are ready for all scenarios in all the theatres.”
- Concurrently, the IDF continues to engage in operations in Lebanon and Gaza. While Israel is making progress in uprooting terror infrastructure on both fronts, it has come at a high cost with 23 soldiers falling in the last week.
Israel – US coordination: US officials appear satisfied with the operation. Although the mission was carried out solely by Israel, coordination with the US, particularly over overflight airspace, was crucial.
- According to reports of a phone call last week between President Biden and Prime Minister Netanyahu, Biden had warned Israel not to target the nuclear or energy sectors.
- Instead, the US encouraged Israel to respond strongly enough to deter further attacks while minimising the risk of further escalation.
- The THAAD (Terminal High-Altitude Area Defence) battery is now deployed in Israel manned by US personnel for the first time ever.
- Secretary of Defence Austin continues to speak regularly with Defence Minister Gallant, following the strike Austin once more reaffirmed the US “ironclad commitment to Israel’s security and support for its right to defend itself.” According to the Pentagon, “He told the Minister that Iran should not make the mistake of responding to Israel’s strikes, which should mark the end of this exchange.“
Internal criticism: The Israeli government faced criticism from within the Likud faction as well as the opposition for not taking the opportunity to strike Iran’s nuclear programme.
- Leader of the Opposition Yair Lapid stated, “I congratulate the IAF for once again proving its operational capabilities of the highest level in the world and its aerial superiority. Israel’s enemies know this morning that the IDF is strong, can attack powerfully, and reach anywhere. The decision not to attack strategic and economic targets in Iran was mistaken. We could have and should have exacted a much higher price from Iran.”
- The government was cautious, given that it was already engaged in conflicts on two fronts, and was less inclined to open a new major conflict. However, following the Iranian attack three weeks ago, which included 180 ballistic missiles, Israel felt compelled to respond.
Diplomatic initiatives: Following two months of no talks, Mossad director Barnea, arrived in Doha, to begin talks with the director of the CIA, Burns, and Prime Minister of Qatar, Al Thani with a view to revisit parameters to enable the release of the 101 hostages now held for 388 days.
- Not to be outdone by Qatar, Egyptian President Sisi has proposed a ten-day cease-fire in Gaza to exchange four Israeli hostages and an unspecified number of Palestinian prisoners in order to kickstart more substantial negotiations.
- Prime Minister has directed Sin Bet director Bar to engage with Egypt to improve the terms. All this without it being clear if Hamas will consent to a deal.
- US envoy Hochstein is expected to arrive in Israel tomorrow to see if there scope to reach a ceasefire in the north.
Looking Ahead: Israel remains on high alert, waiting to see if Iran will respond militarily.
- The current prevailing view in Israel is that Iran will respond, as the regime cannot afford to appear weak, both externally and domestically.
- If Iran does retaliate, it risks leaving itself vulnerable to further attacks.
- Regardless, with Iranian air defences down, Israel may choose to strike more targets again


