LATEST

Israel, the UK and the world

Key background
  • The UK and Israel share a strong relationship, built on historical, economic, and diplomatic ties. Both nations collaborate closely in trade, science, technology, and defence, with the UK being a key partner to Israel. The UK supports Israel’s right to exist as a Jewish state. Scientific progress, academic partnerships, and shared values of democracy further strengthen the bond.
  • Israel maintains diplomatic ties with 165 of the other 192 UN member states.
  • Israel maintains full diplomatic relations with two of its Arab neighbours, Egypt and Jordan, after signing peace treaties with the former in 1979, and the latter, 1994.
  • In 2020, supported by the US, Israel signed the Abraham Accords agreements establishing diplomatic relations with Bahrain, the UAE and Morocco.
BICOM Statement
BICOM Statement

Updated September 22, 2025

Statement on the UK’s unilateral recognition of a Palestinian state

In response to the Prime Minister’s statement on the UK unilateral recognition of a Palestinian state, BICOM questions how this performative gesture truly serves the interest of peace.

Not only does it reward and embolden Hamas, it uses recognition as a punishment on Israel, a first in international affairs.

This symbolic gesture does nothing to advance the UK’s stated objective of realising a two-state solution. This moves changes nothing the ground, but inadvertently weakens peace camps on both sides, and raises the bar of expectations, that when not met could lead to further violence.

The move weakens UK influence as an honest broker in the region and punishes a democratic ally with whom UK has many shared interests and values, not least security, intelligence and trade relations. There are some fundamental questions that remain unanswered:

  • What exactly is being recognised?
  • How will this contribute to ending the war?
  • Has it compelled Hamas to release the hostages, or has it emboldened them?
  • Has it improved the safety and security of both Israelis and Palestinians?
  • Has it disarmed Hamas, to prevent their violent suppression of its own people and their explicitly stated plans for the next October 7 massacre?

With little consideration for these fundamentals, it’s highly unlikely that a Palestinian state will be realised any time soon. Ironically, premature recognition is likely to lead to the prolonging of the war in Gaza, as Hamas have proven that terrorism is rewarded by the west.

Richard Pater, Director of BICOM

September 18, 2025

Questioning unilateral recognition of a Palestinian state

Palestinians in Ein Hajla, in the Jordan Valley near the West Bank city of Jericho
Palestinians in Ein Hajla, in the Jordan Valley near the West Bank city of Jericho, on January 31, 2014. Photo by Hadas Parush/Flash90

New Research: With the UK’s recognition of a Palestinian statehood imminent, BICOM’s report:

  1. Assesses the Montevideo standards for recognition, examining how the Palestinian Authority does or does not meet them. And consider both cases lacking international recognition (e.g. Taiwan, Northern Cyprus, Somaliland) and cases of newly recognised states by the UK (South Sudan, East Timor, Kosovo).
  2. Demonstrates how premature recognition undermines peace efforts. Recognition can pressure both Israelis and Palestinians into actions that make a peaceful settlement harder, not easier. Recognition will not create a Palestinian state nor advance the creation of one; rather, it will be the most significant diplomatic gain for the Palestinian cause in decades, universally understood as having been made possible by the October 7 massacre.
  3. Analyses British policy on the two-state solution. If the two-state solution is indeed the desired goal, then policies must encourage conditions that make this outcome more likely and discourage those that make it less likely. Recognition at this stage, or interventions which halt the war before Hamas is defeated, protect and strengthen Hamas and are therefore counterproductive.
  4. Highlights the diplomatic consequences. Recognition would take place in the context of already worsening UK–Israel relations and would further deteriorate ties between two countries that until recently considered themselves strategic partners.

September 11, 2025

President Herzog meets PM Starmer

Prime Minister Starmer welcomed Israeli President Isaac Herzog to No 10
Prime Minister Starmer welcomed Israeli President Isaac Herzog to No 10, September 10, 2025. Photo credit: Isaac Herzog / X

The meeting: Prime Minister Starmer welcomed Israeli President Isaac Herzog to No 10 yesterday, however the two reportedly had a number of “tough” exchanges on disagreements regarding the war in Gaza and British plans to recognise a Palestinian state later this month. 

  • According to the British press release after the meeting, Starmer condemned Israel’s strike in Doha as “completely unacceptable” and “a flagrant violation of a key partner’s sovereignty.” 
  • The statement ended by describing the UK and Israel as “longstanding allies” and ruling out any future role for Hamas in Palestinian governance.
  • According to the Israeli press release, Herzog warned that the upcoming recognition of the Palestinian state would “embolden extremists across the Middle East and beyond.” He further  warned against “the dangerous echoing of Hamas’s propaganda campaign of starvation in Gaza.”
  • Herzog spoke later at a Chatham House event where he said, “Things were said that were tough and strong, and clearly, we can argue, because when allies meet, they can argue. We are both democracies.”
  • Starmer’s made a similar commitment – to reject any future role for Hamas in Gaza – when he met Palestinian Authority Chairman Abbas two days earlier. There was no public criticism directed against Abbas after that meeting, despite some hopes that issues of institutional incitement, pay to slay, and endemic corruption would be made.   

Doha strike: Responding to international criticism of Israel’s airstrike in Doha on a Hamas target, Prime Minister Netanyahu released a video statement in English:

  • “What did America do in the wake of September 11? It promised to hunt down the terrorists who committed this heinous crime wherever they may be. And it passed a resolution in the Security Council of the UN two weeks later that said that governments cannot give harbour to terrorists. Yesterday, we acted along those lines. We went after the terrorist masterminds who committed the October 7 massacre. And we did so in Qatar which gives safe haven, it harbours terrorists, it finances Hamas, it gives its terrorist chieftains sumptuous villas, it gives them everything.”
  • Qatari Prime Minister Mohammed bin Abdulrahman bin Jassim Al Thani criticised Netanyahu, accusing him of “wasting time” on hostage negotiations and adding that Qatar was “reassessing” its role as a mediator. He added, “What Netanyahu has done, he just killed any hope for those hostages. He broke every international law.”
  • Other regional actors also condemned the Israeli attack in Doha. Saudi Arabia called it “brutal aggression” and a flagrant violation of the sovereignty of a “sisterly state.” The UAE called it a “blatant and cowardly act” and cancelled Israel’s participation in a prestigious air show. Turkey, which also hosts senior Hamas figures, accused Israel of having “adopted terrorism as state policy.”
  • The Wall Street Journal describes a heated phone call between President Trump and Prime Minister Netanyahu yesterday, followed apparently by a second, more cordial one. In the first call, Trump expressed his dissatisfaction with the Israeli air strike in Doha, calling it “unwise,” and further expressed his disappointment at having learned of the impending strike from his military and not directly from Israel. 
  • Qatari authorities reported that six people were killed in the Israeli air strike in Doha, including one Qatari security officer. Hamas has claimed that the five other fatalities in the airstrike do not include any of the senior officials targeted by Israel. There were conflicting reports in Arab media about injuries sustained by senior Hamas officials or the identities of some of the unnamed people killed in the strike. Hamas officials told Saudi newspaper Asharq Al-Awsat that two members of the organisation’s political bureau were wounded in Israel’s Tuesday strike on the Qatari capital, Doha, with one of them in serious condition.
  • The prevailing Israeli assessment yesterday was that the strike did not succeed in killing its targets and that the senior Hamas officials were not in the room that was hit. One unnamed Israeli official was quoted anonymously in Maariv as saying, “This attack has a powerful psychological effect. We’re talking about murderers with blood on their hands. If they weren’t eliminated, we’ll remove them from the world at the next opportunity. Those murderers won’t have immunity anywhere.”
  • A report in Israel Hayom indicates that the Shin Bet assessed that the strike in Doha could have an effect on morale in Gaza, highlighting their lavish lifestyles of Hamas leaders in comparison to the misery in the Strip.

Hostage released: Elizabeth Tzurkov, the Israeli citizen who was abducted in Baghdad while doing research for her Princeton doctoral thesis, was released from captivity and has arrived in Israel, where she is undergoing treatment at Sheba Hospital under the same protocol as hostages released from Gaza. 

  • She was held in captivity for 903 days by Hezbollah affiliate in Iraq.

Looking ahead: Israeli preparations for a ground offensive in Gaza City continue, as does the evacuation of civilians from the city to southern parts of the Strip. 

  • Since the IDF issued an evacuation order of the city on Tuesday, some 200,000 people left. Nearly one million people were estimated to be residing there before. Gaza City’s population before October 7 was just over 500,000. It was evacuated early in the war in 2023, but repopulated during the ceasefire in January-March 2025, including  many Gazans displaced from other places in the Strip.
  • Multiple reports indicate that Egypt is eager to step in as a mediator in ceasefire talks. An Israeli attack on Egyptian soil similar to the one carried out in Doha would be unthinkable, something that could work to Cairo’s advantage. Egypt is also unlikely to permanently house Hamas terrorists in five-star hotels as Qatar has done for the last decade.

September 9, 2025

UK rules out genocide as Israel braces for Gaza battle

Keir Starmer and David Lammy.
Keir Starmer and David Lammy. Photo credit: Simon Dawson / No 10 Downing Street (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)

What’s happened: Prime Minister Keir Starmer welcomed Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas to No 10 Downing yesterday, ahead of the Government’s anticipated recognition of a Palestinian state. Abbas was recently denied a US visa to attend the United Nations General Assembly. According to a statement released by the Prime Minister’s Office, Starmer and Abbas “both agreed there will be absolutely no role for Hamas in the future governance of Palestine.”

  • In a letter sent to Sarah Champion, chair of the international development committee, Foreign Secretary David Lammy wrote that the UK Government had determined that Israel was not committing genocide in Gaza.
  • The letter was sent by Lammy just before he left the position of Foreign Secretary. Previously, Lammy and other British officials had taken the position that the Government could not make such a determination absent a judicial ruling from the ICJ. But in the letter, Lammy asserted that “the crime of genocide occurs only where there is specific ‘intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial or religious group’. The government has not concluded that Israel is acting with that intent.”
  • Six people were killed and at least seven others seriously wounded in yesterday’s shooting attack in Jerusalem. The dead were named as Levi Yitzhak Pash, 57, Yaakov Pinto, 25, Yisrael Matzner, 28, Rabbi Yosef David, 43, Rabbi Mordechai Steintzag, 79, and Sarah Mendelson, 60. The Palestinian gunmen, men in their twenties from an area of the West Bank just northwest of Jerusalem, were killed by an off-duty soldier, ending the shooting rampage.
  • Four IDF soldiers were killed yesterday when Hamas gunmen opened fire on an IDF Armored Corps position in Jabaliya in the northern Gaza Strip and hurled an explosive device into their tank. They were named as First Sgt. Uri Lamed, 20, Sgt. Gadi Kotal, 20, Lt. Matan Abramovitz, 21, and Sgt. Amit Aryeh Regev, 19. A fifth soldier was injured in the attack. 904 IDF soldiers have fallen since the war began on October 7, 2023, 54 of them since the last ceasefire ended in March of this year.
  • This morning, the IDF’s Arabic-language spokesperson announced a broad evacuation order for Gaza City. “The IDF is determined to defeat Hamas and will operate in the Gaza City area with great force, just as it has throughout the strip,” the announcement said. It also contained a phone number to report any Hamas roadblocks preventing people from evacuating.

Context: The Israeli offensive into Gaza City has focused over the last two days on high-rise buildings used by Hamas. At least five have been destroyed after specific evacuation warnings by the IDF. There were no reports of casualties from the strikes, images of which were widely posted and shared.

  • Referring to the downed towers yesterday, Prime Minister Netanyahu said, “All this is just the prelude for the main intensive operation and that is a ground maneuver by our troops, who are now organising, for inside Gaza City. And that is why I am telling Gaza’s residents: I am using this opportunity and listen to me well. You have been warned. Leave.”
  • Writing in Israel Hayom, Yoav Limor reports that thus far only about 10% of Gaza City’s residents have evacuated. He further notes that in the last major operation in Gaza City, in November 2023, the IDF lost 122 soldiers. This was in a less extensive battle than the one planned for now, and in a city that had been thoroughly evacuated in the first dramatic weeks of the war following the October 7 attacks.
  • With an Israeli ground offensive imminent, a last-ditch effort to reach a diplomatic agreement is also underway. The Trump administration’s new proposal would see an immediate release of all remaining Israeli hostages on the first day in exchange for thousands of Palestinian security prisoners held by Israel. A ceasefire would be guaranteed by the United States for as long as negotiations were ongoing for an end to the war.
  • President Trump posted on social media that “the Israelis have accepted my Terms. It is time for Hamas to accept as well.” He added,  “I have warned Hamas about the consequences of not accepting. This is my last warning, there will not be another one!”
  • Hamas has not given a definitive response to the Trump proposal. Sources close to Hamas report that the organisation believes it is logistically impossible to free all hostages on the first day of the ceasefire, though it appears that much of the apparent difficulty relates to the challenge of extricating the bodies of dead hostages more than to liberating the living ones.
  • Channel 12 news reports that Israel assesses that there will be internal disagreement among the Hamas leadership over the question of whether it can accept Trump’s conditions. Even if the answer is affirmative, the question is whether it can trust the American guarantees and to hold negotiations in practice on the basis of these principles.
  • According to a report on Kan radio, officials in Jerusalem believe Hamas will likely reject the American proposal, and that this will pave the way for Israel’s anticipated operation in Gaza City.

Looking ahead: President Isaac Herzog will be in London this week to “show solidarity with the Jewish community, which is under severe attack and facing a wave of antisemitism.” He is scheduled to meet with Prime Minister Starmer on Wednesday and likely to meet Foreign Secretary Yvette Cooper as well.

September 8, 2025

Donald Trump presents new hostage deal

Donald Trump in the White House.
Donald Trump in the White House. Photo credit: The White House

What’s happened: President Trump has reportedly passed a new proposal for a comprehensive hostage and ceasefire deal to Hamas’s leadership. 

  • Trump wrote on Truth Social, “Everyone wants the Hostages HOME. Everyone wants this War to end! The Israelis have accepted my Terms. It is time for Hamas to accept as well. I have warned Hamas about the consequences of not accepting. This is my last warning, there will not be another one!”
  • According to the new plan:
    • All 48 living and dead hostages are to be released on the first day of the deal, in return Israel will simultaneously release hundreds of terrorists and thousands of Palestinian detainees.
    • Israel will halt Operation Gideon’s Chariots II and the takeover over of Gaza City. 
    • Negotiations will begin immediately to end the war, personally overseen by President Trump. 
    • The fighting will not be renewed as long as the negotiations remain ongoing. 
  • While according to Trump, Israel has accepted his terms, Hamas released a statement saying it, “received, through mediators, some ideas from the American side to reach a ceasefire agreement. Accordingly, Hamas welcomes any move that will assist in the efforts to halt the aggression against our people. Hamas affirms its readiness to immediately sit at the negotiating table to discuss the release of all prisoners in exchange for a clear declaration of an end to the war, a full withdrawal from the Gaza Strip, and the formation of a committee to administer the Gaza Strip from independent Palestinians, which will assume its duties immediately.”
  • The Hostage and Missing Families Forum issued a statement noting, “The provision of the US president’s personal guarantee is an historic development of the utmost importance. We call on the Israeli government to announce its unreserved support for the emerging agreement.”

Context: The support from President Trump has been a crucial factor in Israel’s continued military campaign. His direct involvement in this latest proposal could force the hands of all parties and bring the war to an end. 

  • Meanwhile the fighting in Gaza City intensified over the weekend with preliminary bombings of high-rise buildings. The airstrikes focused on hundreds of surveillance cameras and anti-tank firing positions, and sniping positions on the upper floors of high-rises of buildings in the centre and west of the city.
  • As ever, the IDF highlighted, “Prior to the strike, steps were taken in order to mitigate harm to civilians, including advanced warnings to the population, the use of precise munitions, aerial surveillance, and additional intelligence.”
  • Despite almost two years of fighting, it is understood that Hamas still possesses a variety of military surveillance technologies.
  • A secondary objective of targeting the high rise buildings (deliberately in broad daylight), is to encourage the civilian population to leave the city. In line with this, according to the IDF they have now set up a new “displaced persons city” near Khan Yunis, with “water, food and medical infrastructure.” 
  • In the latest assessment, the takeover of the city itself will not take more than a couple of weeks. However, the IDF has continued to warn that the whole operation could take a year. This is primarily due to the large network of tunnels remaining underneath Gaza City, as well as the presence of hostages who are still alive in them. 
  • It is estimated that 10,000 armed operatives are currently inside Gaza City, but as in the past many or even most are expected to flee the area along with the civilian population.  Due to the scale, it is not feasible for the IDF to screen everyone leaving.
  • In light of these challenges, military analysts suggest that Hamas cannot be destroyed in this operation, and the goal is to degrade the terrorist infrastructure used by the Gaza City Brigade.
  • However, one of the IDF’s main targets will be Hamas’s current leader in Gaza City, Izz al-Din Haddad who commands the city’s brigade. According to military assessments, he has restored much of its command-and-control capabilities over the past year. Hamas’ centre of power consists of a network of tunnels is located in western Gaza City. It was partly damaged during the December 2023 ground operation, but has since been repaired.
  • Whilst the IDF prepares to operate with a massive force deployment in to the city, there is concern that Hamas may choose to attack troops manning static positions along the recently established corridors in southern Gaza, as happened during Hamas’s multi-pronged attack two weeks ago. Similarly there could be attacks along the buffer zone set up adjacent to Israeli communities as there are likely still tunnels in the proximity. 
  • According to reports out of Gaza, the terrorist Mahmoud Afana was eliminated in an IDF strike. Afana participated in the October 7 massacre and in a phone call he placed from Kibbutz Mefalsim boasted to his family that he had personally murdered ten Israelis. That call was recorded, and subsequently shared as evidence.    
  • Israel maintains residual concern that whilst Hamas might accept a new technocratic leadership of the Strip, a scenario in which it is allowed to maintain its weapons and military wing, they will seek a Hezbollah style model of operating a terrorist army under a weak political framework.     
  • Alongside the fighting, Israeli continues to facilitate aid into Gaza. According to the IDF, “Over the past week, close to 1,900 trucks were collected and distributed this week from the Gazan side of the Kerem Shalom and Zikim Crossings. Over 1,500 humanitarian aid trucks primarily containing food, entered through the crossings this week.” 

Looking ahead: President Herzog will arrive in London later this week to meet with senior representatives of the government. 

  • The timing, ahead of the UN General Assembly, and the UK’s anticipated announcement to recognise a Palestinian state, is aimed at maintaining the close Britain – Israel relationship at this sensitive time.
  • According to the President’s office, “The purpose of the visit is to show solidarity with the Jewish community, which is under severe attack and facing a wave of antisemitism.” 

September 2, 2025

IDF call ups begin following stormy cabinet meeting

Recruiting of new IDF soldiers at the Tel haShomer army base in Ramat Gan
Recruiting of new IDF soldiers at the Tel haShomer army base in Ramat Gan. August 05, 2025. Photo by Miriam Alster/Flash90 *** Local Caption *** גיוס תל השומר חיילים לשכת הגיוס

What’s happened: Emergency call up orders began to go into effect yesterday with 40,000 reservist soldiers mobilised. This is taking place as the IDF prepares to embark on a broad offensive operation into Gaza City.

  • Most reservists are not likely to enter Gaza. They are, rather, relieving soldiers in the West Bank and on the northern border who are slated to be a part of the upcoming operation, which will involve five divisions.
  • The Israeli government’s public position remains that only a comprehensive deal that would release all hostages could avert the operation. A stormy cabinet session was held on Sunday regarding the war in Gaza. Ministers did not vote on the ceasefire deal on the table, though Hamas appears to have accepted it. This deal would include a 60-day ceasefire and a partial release of the remaining hostages.
  • Belgium announced that it would recognise a Palestinian state at the UN General Assembly later this month. Foreign Minister Maxime Prevot also announced 12 “firm sanctions” against Israel, including a ban on importing products from settlement. Prevot’s announcement stipulated that the “administrative formalisation of this recognition” would only take effect “when the last hostage is released.”
  • Foreign Secretary David Lammy reiterated his commitment to recognise a Palestinian state “unless the Israeli Government takes substantive steps to end the appalling situation in Gaza and commits to a long-term sustainable peace.” He added, “To those who say recognition rewards Hamas or threatens Israeli security – it does neither,” without explaining how this was the case. 
  • Alluding to the humanitarian crisis in Gaza, Lammy said that “words of condemnation… are not enough. But be in no doubt: we have acted, as a country, where we can.” He went on to list  actions taken by the Government: “We restored funding to UNRWA. We suspended arms exports that could be used in Gaza. We signed a landmark agreement with the Palestinian Authority. We stood up for the independence of international courts. We have delivered three sanctions packages, three, on violent settlers and far-right Israeli Ministers for incitement. We suspended trade negotiations with the Israeli Government. We are at the forefront of the international community’s work to plan for a stable, post-conflict peace. And we have provided nearly over £250m in development assistance over the past two years.”
  • None of this actions mentioned by Lammy is putting any  pressure on Hamas to release the hostages  or  exerting diplomatic pressure for the October 7 attacks. Nor did he mention any action relating to states, allied with Britain, that harbour leading Hamas figures, such as Qatar or Turkey.
  • Lammy also announced the triggering of the “snapback” procedure for sanctions against Iran. These will go into effect in 30 days barring some diplomatic breakthrough with Iran.
  • 320 trucks of humanitarian aid crossed from Israel into Gaza yesterday through crossings at Kerem Shalom in the southern Gaza Strip and Zikim in the north. COGAT reports that 350 trucks were collected and distributed by aid organisations yesterday, as opposed to 170 the day before, with hundreds more still waiting on the Gaza side of the border for collection. 

Cabinet leaks: Multiple Israeli media outlets gave detailed reports of a stormy cabinet meeting on Sunday evening, all based on anonymous leaks.

  • It is understood that the heads of the IDF, National Security Council, Mossad, and Shin Bet strongly support accepting the ceasefire deal which would see the release of 10 out of 20 living Israeli hostages and a 60 day pause in fighting. The Prime Minister and most of the cabinet oppose this. All four men are Netanyahu appointees. The security chiefs all expressed severe doubts about the planned military offensive into Gaza City.
  • The IDF estimates around 100 fatalities to its forces in an operation to conquer Gaza City in an operation that could take as long as a year to complete successfully. Chief of General Staff Eyal Zamir told the Government that such an operation would necessarily mean a military government in Gaza, with all the attendant legal and operational obligations that would entail. Israel would be directly responsible for the welfare of Gazans in territory its forces occupy in a way it has not been since 1994. And its soldiers would be constant targets of guerrilla attacks.
  • Mossad Director David Barnea spoke out more forcefully than in the past in favour of the current ceasefire deal. He was quoted in television reports as saying, “That’s the proposal that is on the table, and we need to take it.”
  • Most of the media attention, however, focused on Zamir, with many harsh and pointed statements attributed to him or to his critics. Orit Struck, one of the most far-right figures in the Cabinet, obliquely referred to Zamir with a Mishnaic reference to “the man who fears and is soft-hearted.” Zamir responded to her, “I came to carry out two of my life’s missions: to prevent nuclear [weapons] in Iran and to destroy Hamas. Every morning I approve attacks everywhere. No one is soft of heart. If you want blind obedience, get someone else.”
  • Confronted by the Cabinet Secretary with Ministers’ demands to defeat Hamas, Zamir responded with a sarcastic Hebrew phrase that can be translated as “you don’t say?” or “good morning sunshine!” and added, “you were the security cabinet on October 7. Now you’ve remembered to talk about defeating Hamas?”
  • Various reports in the Hebrew press referenced Cabinet ministers who dissented from the majority position and preferred taking the ceasefire deal and partial hostage release now rather than embarking on the new offensive into Gaza City. Most reports mentioned Foreign Minister Gidon Saar as one of the opponents of the new operation, with concerns about Israel’s diplomatic position at the upcoming UN General Assembly attributed to him. 

Looking ahead: In preparing a response to the upcoming announcements of recognition of a Palestinian state by France, Britain, Canada, and others, Prime Minister Netanyahu will convene a consultation on annexing parts of the West Bank.

  • The cabinet are expected to explore various proposals, including annexation of settlement blocs, of Areas C, or of the Jordan Valley. An initiative to annex the Jordan Valley was stopped in its tracks in 2020 by the announcement of normalisation agreements with Bahrain and the UAE.
  • The Jordan Valley stretches from the Sea of Galilee to the Dead Sea, forming a natural border between the West Bank and Jordan. It is sparsely populated and serves as a vital buffer zone and holds strategic significance for Israel’s security.

July 30, 2025

UK to reward Hamas with recognition of Palestinian state

Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer delivering his speech on Gaza, Downing Street Press Briefing Room. July 29, 2025.
Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer delivering his speech on Gaza, Downing Street Press Briefing Room. July 29, 2025. Photo credit: Photo credit: Screengrab from Keir Starmer / X

What’s happened: The UK Government announced that it will recognise a Palestinian state at the UN General Assembly in September unless Israel fulfils a list of conditions to ameliorate the situation in Gaza. Malta joined the UK announcement, and several other states, including Australia and New Zealand, indicated they might be inclined to join the initiative.

  • Speaking from Downing Street, Prime Minister Starmer said, “We are determined to protect the viability of the two-state solution, and so we will recognise the state of Palestine in September before UNGA; unless the Israeli government takes substantive steps to end the appalling situation in Gaza and commits to a long term sustainable peace, including through allowing the UN to restart without delay the supply of humanitarian support to the people of Gaza to end starvation, agreeing to a ceasefire, and making clear there will be no annexations in the West Bank. We will make an assessment ahead of UNGA on how far the parties have met these steps. No one side will have a veto on recognition through their actions or inactions.”
  • At the United Nations, Foreign Secretary Lammy echoed the Prime Minister’s statement, including the conditions: “We will do it unless the Israeli government acts to end the appalling situation in Gaza, ends its military campaign and commits to a long-term sustainable peace based on a two-state solution.”
  • Both Starmer and Lammy demanded that Hamas release hostages, cease fire, and have no role in the future governance of Gaza, but neither made acceding to these demands a condition for recognition or, for that matter, any British policy move.
  • French Foreign Minister Jean-Noël Barrot praised the British announcement, saying “Together, through this momentous decision and our joint efforts, we are ending the infinite cycle of violence and re-opening the prospect of peace in the region.” It remains to be seen if indeed this decision has in fact ended the cycle of violence.
  • The Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs said the decision “constitutes a reward for Hamas and harms efforts to achieve a ceasefire in Gaza and a framework for the release of the hostages.” Prime Minister Netanyahu posted on social media that “Starmer rewards Hamas’s monstrous terrorism & punishes its victims,” adding that “A jihadist state on Israel’s border TODAY will threaten Britain TOMORROW.” 
  • Opposition Leader Yair Lapid was more concerned with the lack of seriousness in the French and British recognition declarations. Recognising a Palestine state, he said, “won’t make it come into existence. The problem is that they don’t ask themselves the fundamental questions: Within what borders? What is its capital? What leadership does it have? What system of government? Is it a democracy? Does it support the right of return? Does it have the means to deal with an attempt by Hamas to take over right after it is established?”
  • President Trump, for his part, said of the British decision, “If you do that, you really are rewarding Hamas, and I don’t think they should be rewarded.”
  • The British announcement follows the French government’s pledge to recognise a Palestinian state at the UNGA in September, and a host of European initiatives designed to pressure Israel to halt the war in Gaza — even with Hamas still in power and the Israeli hostages still languishing in its tunnels. These include a possible move by the EU to suspend Israel from the Horizon Europe program, a large and generously funded development program for scientific and industrial research. 
  • Yedioth Ahronot reported that Israel and Germany are conducting intensive negotiations for a compromise that would see the Germans blocking such initiatives in exchange for Israel agreeing to an EU task force that would oversee compliance with EU demands regarding humanitarian aid into Gaza. Such a task force would determine if Israel has, as apparently agreed, doubled the entry of aid into Gaza or not, and if the task force is satisfied that it has, the various sanctions bruited would be suspended.

Context: Despite protestations from both the Prime Minister and the Foreign Secretary that “no one side will have a veto on recognition through their actions or inactions,” the stipulation that unless a ceasefire is agreed to the recognition will go forward grants just such a veto. All Hamas needs to do to ensure Britain recognises a Palestinian state is refuse to release any hostages. In fact, if Starmer and Lammy are taken at their word, any Hamas agreement now to even a partial hostage release and ceasefire would actually stymie the recognition effort. 

  • This isn’t just a theoretical argument, but a recapitulation writ large of the diplomatic developments of the last fortnight. On July 23, Hamas and Israel were to finally sign off on a ceasefire agreement which would have liberated ten of the twenty living Israeli hostages after months of painstaking negotiations. But on July 21, Lammy and 28 other Foreign Ministers issued a combative statement against Israel’s war effort essentially granting all of Hamas’ demands for free. Unsurprisingly, Hamas immediately scuppered the ceasefire talks, raising new demands on July 22, and the ceasefire and hostage release never came to pass.
  • The recognition announcement follows weeks of intense pressure inside the Government and in Parliament for such a move, in both cases motivated more by anger at Israel than by any real assessment of the meaning of recognition or the dynamics of the conflict. States are normally recognised after they are founded. This recognition would be of a state that all acknowledge does not presently exist, even if many would very much like to see it come into being. For those so inclined, there is no reckoning with why exactly there isn’t a Palestinian state. Such a state could have been established at the end of the British Mandate following the UN partition resolution in 1947 or at any time during the Arab occupation of the West Bank and Gaza Strip between 1948 and 1967, but was not. It could have been established as a result of peace talks in 2000, 2001, 2008, 2014, but on each those occasions it was the Palestinians who rejected statehood because it could only be effected by a full reconciliation with a Jewish state next door.
  • The Foreign Secretary’s statement at the UN yesterday included the sentence “Hamas must never be rewarded for its monstrous attack on October 7,” but there is no way of understanding the British policy as anything but such a reward, and indeed it was publicly welcomed by Hamas. What the Palestinians refused to accept in peace negotiations, the UK is endeavouring to grant them without peace and following the worst massacre of Jews since the Holocaust.

Looking ahead: Israel has not made any announcement of steps it might take in response to the French and British moves.

  • Bezalel Smotrich, Finance Minister and leader of a far-right party in the Knesset pushed for a partial annexation of territory in Gaza. Even outside far-right and pro-settler circles in Israeli politics there have been voices calling for territorial losses to be used a lever to pressure Hamas.
  • The thinking behind this is that Hamas is not moved by the difficult conditions of Gaza civilians — on the contrary, it sees only political gains when the humanitarian situation worsens — but that Hamas would be loath to loss territory.
  • Sources in the Government poured cold water on the idea, with Shas leader Aryeh Deri reportedly saying in Cabinet yesterday that “We have nothing to look for in Gaza,” and another unnamed Minister telling Israeli media that the annexation idea is “not really on the table,” but rather just a threat to pressure Hamas.

July 22, 2025

US Ambassador calls joint statement by foreign ministers ‘disgusting’

US and Israeli flags
US and Israeli flags

What’s happened: Foreign Ministers of 29 countries, including the UK, issued a joint statement yesterday on the situation in Gaza and the West Bank calling for an immediate end to the war and castigating Israel for the humanitarian situation in Gaza as well as for settlement activity in the West Bank.

  • Also yesterday, Foreign Secretary David Lammy spoke to Parliament about the situation in the Middle East, emphasising many of the same points made in the joint statement. In his comments, he referenced signing the statement with “31 Foreign Ministers,” a possible indication that some countries might have backed out at the last minute.
  • Lammy’s statement began with a short update on the situation in Syria, which condemned the violence in as-Suwayda this past week but studiously avoided taking sides.
  • The rest of his comments were devoted to the Israeli-Palestinian situation. Regarding the war in Gaza, Lammy’s position was clear: “The war in Gaza must end now. There is no military solution. Negotiations will secure the hostages. Further bloodshed serves no purpose. Hamas and Israel must both commit to a ceasefire now, and the next ceasefire must be the last ceasefire.”
  • The comments ended with a summary of actions taken by the Government on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict in its year in office. Whether deliberately or not, the list of actions was decidedly unbalanced: restored UNRWA funding, suspended arms licences for Israel, humanitarian assistance for the Palestinians, sanctions packages on settlers, suspended trade negotiations with Israel, sanctions on far-right Israeli ministers, defences of international courts prosecuting Israel and Israeli leaders, and a “landmark agreement with the Palestinian Authority.”
  • Israel’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs issued a statement rejecting the joint statement, not just for its content but also for “sending the wrong message to Hamas” that international pressure on Israel could yield the benefits Hamas seeks more effectively than agreeing to release hostages. The joint statement, according to the Israeli MFA, “fails to focus the pressure on Hamas and fails to recognise Hamas’s role and responsibility for the situation. Hamas is the sole party responsible for the continuation of the war and the suffering on both sides.”
  • US Ambassador to Israel reacted to the joint statement on X stating: “Disgusting! 25 nations put pressure on Israel instead of savages of Hamas! Gaza suffers for 1 reason: Hamas rejects EVERY proposal. Blaming Israel is irrational.”

Context: Lammy told Parliament that “we are striving to keep open the prospects of a two-state solution,” and two sentences later boasted of restoring funding to UNRWA, seemingly without noticing the contradiction between the two positions. UNRWA is the agency that maintains the “refugee” status of Palestinians born in Palestinian territory living under Palestinian government.

  • Funding UNRWA doesn’t open the prospect of a two-state solution; it entrenches the Palestinian fantasy that justice can only be served when Palestinians can “return” to Israel and undo the existence of a Jewish state. The Palestinian demand for “return,” and not any Israeli insistence on settlements, was what torpedoed final status talks in all three rounds of negotiations that were held (2000-1, 2007-8, 2013-4).
  • Indeed, the gaps between the Israeli and Palestinian positions on which settlement areas would be evacuated and which annexed to Israel in territorial swaps were comparatively tiny and inconsequential to negotiations. But nothing in the joint statement nor in Lammy’s comments to Parliament yesterday addresses why there wasn’t a Palestinian state created in 2000 or 2008 (or for that matter 1948).
  • The claims about the controversial construction plan known as E1 are equally incoherent. The joint statement says that “the E1 settlement plan, if implemented, would divide a Palestinian state in two,” which is bad math and bad geography. A potential Palestinian state is already divided into two non-contiguous territories (Gaza Strip and West Bank).
  • Lammy’s statement is a bit clearer on the math, but just as muddled on the geography, claiming that E1 “would separate the West Bank’s north from its south,” but a glance at a map shows that this is entirely untrue, with the entire Jericho corridor still open (and the existing Israeli settlement of Maaleh Adumim still the easternmost area of Israeli settlement in the Jerusalem area).
  • If it were true that E1 could prevent the establishment of a Palestinian state, then it would behove supporters of such a state to press the Palestinians to act now and do what they refused to do in each previous round of negotiations, namely make peace with Israel. Nothing in either the joint statement or Lammy’s comments reckons with Palestinian decision making or preferences or even treats the Palestinian side of the conflict as an actor making decisions and shaping events.
  • Nowhere is this more apparent than in the discussion of the hostages. Both the joint statement and Lammy’s speech to Parliament address the continued captivity of Israelis abducted during the massacre of October 7 as something that can only be addressed by “negotiations,” a stark contrast to their claims regarding Israel’s supposed obligations on aid or territory.
  • “A negotiated ceasefire offers the best hope of bringing them home and ending the agony of their families,” is the way the joint statement addresses the issue, implying that Israel’s failure to meet the ransom demands of their captors is true moral failure, and not the abduction itself. Lammy goes even further in blaming Israel’s leader for the hostages’ plight: “This offensive puts them in grave danger, but still Netanyahu persists.”
  • In contrast, nothing in both statements implies that “negotiations” could secure aid for Gazans or stop Israel’s military offensive. These are presented as things that simply must happen without conditions and which the UK and other countries are prepared to take affirmative action to pressure Israel on.
  • If there is any action which the UK Government or Foreign Secretary Lammy have taken to put pressure on the hostage takers or the allied countries who host Hamas leaders, it went unmentioned in both statements. On the contrary, Qatar is singled out for praise in both statements, and Turkey is never referenced at all.
  • Another point that is missed in the calls for “negotiations” as the only means for liberating hostages is that negotiations are ongoing and have been ongoing for quite some time. As the Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs response to the joint statement notes, “there is a concrete proposal for a ceasefire deal, and Israel has repeatedly said yes to this proposal, while Hamas stubbornly refuses to accept it.”
  • In every version of a proposed agreement, Israel has been willing to pay an exorbitant ransom — in released terrorists, territorial withdrawals, and more — for even partial hostage releases. And despite the implication of both statements that Israel’s position hasn’t allowed for an agreement, it is the Israeli position, not Hamas’, that has considerably moderated in recent weeks along several key points of dispute.
  • The statement also criticises the allegedly “dangerous” mechanism for aid delivery. However the work of the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation is designed to circumvent Hamas expropriation of aid, that further perpetuates its control of the Strip. Earlier this week the GHF announced that it delivers around two million meals a day, and 82 million since it began.

Looking ahead: Lammy’s statement yesterday reaffirmed the UK’s commitment to a two-state solution  without any reckoning with why that solution has not yet been effected on the ground. Moreover, it pledged the UK Government to a number of policies which make the establishment of Palestinian state next to Israel almost impossible.

  • “Hamas and Israel must both commit to a ceasefire now, and the next ceasefire must be the last ceasefire,” according to Lammy. This is a demand to end the war with Hamas still in control of the Gaza Strip. No path to statehood exists with the Palestinian Territories governed by two competing governments, one of them a jihadist terrorist organisation. And no path to peace exists with Hamas still standing, newly legitimised by the international community, and regrouping and mobilising for the next October 7.
  • Funding for UNRWA is not funding for a Palestinian state, but rather funding against one. An investment in the refugee status of Palestinians in Palestinian territory does nothing for the upbuilding of a future state; it only ensures another generation of irredentism, rejectionism, and war.

July 11, 2025

Parliamentary report highlights the Iranian threat in the UK

View of Elizabeth Tower
View of Elizabeth Tower, on the South Bank of the Thames, in London. September 20, 2022. Photo by Nati Shohat/Flash90 *** Local Caption *** לונדון אנגליה ביג בן

What’s happened: The British Parliament’s Intelligence and Security Committee (ISC) published its long awaited report on Iran and the threats it poses to UK national security. 

  • One of its key findings is that the threat posed by Iran is major, and now equal to that of Russia.
  • Its contents primarily take the form of declassified intelligence and interviews with senior officials from MI6, MI5, GCHQ, the Cabinet Office, and Home Office.
  • According to the report, Tehran strategic priorities include:
    • Reducing British military presence in the Middle East.
    • Undermining its relationship and alliance with the US and Israel.
    • Suppressing criticism of the Islamic Republic, especially among UK-based dissident exiles and journalists. An increased threat to Jewish and Israeli interests is also noted.
  • One key finding is that Iran views the UK as one of its most significant adversaries, only behind the US, Israel, and Saudi Arabia. The report also found that the threat of assassination and violence by Iran and its proxies had reached the same level as Russia, and is accompanied by a “significant espionage threat” involving multiple intelligence agencies, including the Ministry of Intelligence and Security (MOIS), IRGC Intelligence Organisation, and IRGC Quds Force. According to the report, both the MOIS and various arms of the IRGC “pose a significant threat to UK national security.”
  • While describing the Iranian threat as “more narrowly focused and opportunistic than the more strategic, all-encompassing and well resourced threats from Russia and China,” the report emphasised that “it should not be underestimated given its persistence” highlighting its “ferociously well resourced” intelligence services and “a high appetite for risk when conducting offensive activity, which means it poses a dynamic and erratic threat.”
  • The following areas were also identified as specific threat elements against the UK and its interests:
    • Physical attacks, i.e. “assassination as an instrument of state policy – targeting dissidents is a high priority for both the Ministry of Intelligence and Security (MOIS) and the IRGC”.
    • Irans’ nuclear weapons programme.
    • Espionage – utilising cyber capabilities and human agents. Iran’s cyber threat is described as manifesting itself “acutely”, being significantly easier to deploy than human agents given a difficult operating environment.
    • Offensive cyber operations, such as attacks on critical national infrastructure.
    • Political interference activity.

Context: Iran has long been understood to pose a major threat to the UK’s national security, but this report is the first time intelligence about its activities and operations has been declassified and made public.

  • In September 2024, GCHQ issued a joint statement with the FBI and US Treasury warning of “the ongoing threat from spear-phishing attacks carried out by cyber actors working on behalf of the Iranian government”, with targeting prioritising “individuals with a nexus to Iranian and Middle Eastern affairs, such as current and former senior government officials, senior think tank personnel, journalists, activists and lobbyists.”
  • In October 2024, MI5’s Director General, Ken McCallum, disclosed that the service had “responded to twenty Iran-backed plots presenting potentially lethal threats to British citizens and UK residents”. These plots are understood to have primarily targeted prominent dissident activists, journalists, Israelis, and members of the Jewish community.
  • In November 2024, a former British Army soldier, Daniel Khalife, was found guilty of having spied for Iran and sentenced to over 14 years in prison for espionage and terrorism offences, including breaches of the Official Secrets Act and eliciting or attempted to elicit information of a kind likely to be useful to a person committing or preparing an act of terrorism.
  • In May 2025, three Iranian men were charged with assisting a foreign intelligence service under the National Security Act following their arrest on suspicion of plotting an attack on the Israeli Embassy in London. Their plea hearing has been scheduled for September 26, and in the event they plead not guilty their trial will take place in October 2026.
  • Iran International, the dissident TV channel, has faced a significant number of attempted attacks by the regime in Tehran. In February 2023, it was forced to temporarily relocated to Washington, DC, due to credible and increased threats. In December of the same year, Magomed-Husejn Dovtaev was found guilty of one charge of attempting to collect information useful for terrorism after surveilling the station’s West London premises.
  • This report marks the culmination of years of research and testimony. While it finished taking evidence in August 2023 and therefore did not respond to the Iranian threat post-7th October, the ISC advised that its findings are still relevant despite a changed and changing regional landscape.

Looking ahead: While the ISC welcomed and praised some of the British government’s recent policy measures against Iran, it was nevertheless critical of the overall approach taken, which it said “suffered from a focus on crisis management and has been primarily driven by concerns over Iran’s nuclear programme – to the exclusion of other issues” and that “fire-fighting has prevented the Government from developing a real understanding of Iran, with a lack of Iran-specific expertise across Government”.

  • From 1 October, enforcement of the Foreign Influence Registration Scheme (FIRS) will begin, with individuals acting under Iran’s direction required to register or face up to five years in prison. The Home Office launched the scheme on 1 July, with a three-month grace period for compliance.
  • The Government is expected to introduce new legislation to close the legal gap preventing the proscription of the IRGC, as confirmed earlier this week by the Minister for the Middle East, Hamish Falconer. However, details of the proposed solution and its timeline remain unclear.
  • Powers to ban state-backed groups that threaten UK national security – outside the framework of existing counter-terror laws – are expected to be developed, after the Home Secretary committed in May to drafting new legislation to that effect.
  • According to the Guardian, “the report will feed into the full government response to the review conducted by Jonathan Hall KC, the independent reviewer of terrorism legislation, into a new proscription mechanism surrounding state-sponsored terrorism.”

July 8, 2025

Netanyahu and Trump coordinate future moves

President Trump and Prime Minister Netanyahu
President Trump and Prime Minister Netanyahu. Photo credit: The White House / X

What’s happened: Prime Minister Netanyahu arrived in Washington and had dinner with President Trump in an event that was not open to media.

  • Before the meeting, Trump announced that talks on a new nuclear deal with Iran were scheduled and he once more pledged to do everything to ensure Iran would not acquire nuclear weapons. “We have scheduled Iran talks,” he said, “and they want to talk. They took a big drubbing, I think, when we hit the three sites, really, I would say the three sites, not just the one. The one was a big one.”
  • Israeli officials in Washington briefing journalists claimed that talks in Doha on a new hostage deal were reaching a conclusion. One much quoted anonymous source said that the deal was “80 to 90 percent agreed on.” In other places, the quote, attributed to a senior official briefing reporters on the flight to Washington, was that Israel had achieved “80 to 90 percent” of its goals in the negations in Doha. 
  • Kan News’ diplomatic correspondent Suleiman Maswadeh reported from Washington that according to Israeli sources there it was possible that an agreement would not be signed this week but rather next. Maswadeh further reported that the delays last week were caused by Hamas rejecting the Witkoff framework, and that Hamas categorically rejected the conditions that might have led to an immediate release of all hostages, rather than the emerging framework for a partial release during the ceasefire.

Gaza: Five IDF soldiers were killed and fourteen others injured yesterday in an incident in Beit Hanoun, in the northern Gaza Strip.

  • All five served in the Netzah Yehuda Battalion of the Kfir Brigade. They were identified as Staff Sergeant Meir Shimon Amar, 20, from Jerusalem; Sergeant Moshe Nissim Frech, 20, from Jerusalem; Sergeant First Class (res.) Benyamin Asulin, 28, from Haifa; Staff Sergeant Noam Aharon Musgadian, 20, from Jerusalem; and Staff Sergeant Moshe Shmuel Noll, 21, from Beit Shemesh. 
  • 37 soldiers have been killed since the end of the ceasefire in March this year. 888 IDF soldiers have been killed in total since the war began on October 7, 2023.
  • The deadly incident in Beit Hanoun occurred roughly one kilometre from the border fence in an area that has been in full control of the IDF since the ground operation began in late October 2023 — including during the two ceasefires. Army Radio reports that it is still unclear how a terrorist squad was able to operate in the area, to plant at least four explosive devices that were remotely detonated.
  • In Khan Yunis in the southern Gaza Strip, IDF Chief of General Staff Eyal Zamir met with troops and reiterated his commitment to the war’s two principal objectives, defeating Hamas and liberating the hostages. “Alongside Iran, the central theatre is in Gaza. We are determined and we will lead here to victory… All roads lead to one place: hostages and victory.”

Context: The talks in Washington are focused on the hostage deal, the anticipated nuclear talks with Iran and wider regional moves towards normalisation between Israel and Sunni Arab states.

  • Talks in Doha dealt not just with the proposed 60-day ceasefire and partial hostage release, but with some general terms regarding the end of the war that would be negotiated during the ceasefire. Leaks to Israeli media suggest that the Israeli Government still rejects a role for the Palestinian Authority in the Strip after the war. “There will be another force in the Strip that will include Palestinians, for sure, but not the PA,” according to the senior Israeli official briefing reporters on the flight to Washington.
  • Israel Hayom claims that Prime Minister Netanyahu rejected proposals from Washington that would have included a rhetorical commitment to a Palestinian state as a way of securing a peace agreement with Saudi Arabia. According to the report, the Prime Minister’s position remains that Palestinian statehood “was permanently removed from the table in the wake of the October 7 massacre.”
  • The US lifted sanctions against Hayat Tahrir al-Sham, the organisation that was led by Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa until he seized power in the country. As of June 23, the organisation is no longer designated as a Foreign Terrorist Organisation by the US State Department.
  • On a visit to Damascus on Saturday, the Foreign Secretary, David Lammy, also announced that the UK would be resuming diplomatic ties with Syria. Despite this, Hayat Tahrir al-Sham remains a proscribed organisation.
  • American mediated talks seek to reach an agreement between Israel and Syria. US officials are reported to believe that an agreement with Syria will soften Netanyahu’s position on Gaza and allow him to make concessions during the negotiations to end the war during the ceasefire he might otherwise have struggled to push through politically.
  • Lebanon, too, is looking to reach an agreement with Israel. Lebanese Prime Minister Nawaf Salam announced that he seeks a security arrangement with Israel which would see the latter fully withdraw from Lebanese territory and commit Lebanon to disarming Hezbollah. 
  • Besides the regional peace initiatives, another goal of the Prime Minister’s visit in Washington is to secure US commitments on Israel’s interests in Iran. Specifically, the Prime Minister reportedly wants US support for a future attack on Iran should the Islamic regime either move its stockpile of highly enriched uranium or rebuild the core facilities damaged by Israeli and US air strikes in June, including not just those related to its nuclear programme but also its missile production sites. 
  • Additionally, Israeli officials seek a US commitment to demand zero enrichment on Iranian soil as a condition for any future nuclear agreement, a position the Trump administration was deliberately ambiguous about in the earlier negotiations conducted in the spring of this year.

Looking ahead: Defence Minister Yisrael Katz has asked the IDF to prepare a “humanitarian city” to be built on the ruins of Rafah in the southern Gaza Strip  

  • A key indicator of progress in the hostage talks will be when US envoy Witkoff joins the talks in Doha.
  • Netanyahu will remain in Washington for at least two more day: Later today, he will meet  Vice President JD Vance and Speaker of the House of Representatives Mike Johnson. Tomorrow, he is scheduled to meet with Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth and on Thursday with leaders of the Jewish community. Sources in the prime minister’s entourage said there is no intention of extending the visit to the US into the weekend this time.

Newsletter sign-up

Please enter your information below to subscribe to our daily newsletter and stay updated and informed.

Donate to BICOM

At BICOM, we rely on the generosity of people like you to keep our website and services running. Your donation, no matter the size, makes a real difference. Please consider supporting us today. For further information please email: [email protected]