In response to the Prime Minister’s statement on the UK unilateral recognition of a Palestinian state, BICOM questions how this performative gesture truly serves the interest of peace.
Not only does it reward and embolden Hamas, it uses recognition as a punishment on Israel, a first in international affairs.
This symbolic gesture does nothing to advance the UK’s stated objective of realising a two-state solution. This moves changes nothing the ground, but inadvertently weakens peace camps on both sides, and raises the bar of expectations, that when not met could lead to further violence.
The move weakens UK influence as an honest broker in the region and punishes a democratic ally with whom UK has many shared interests and values, not least security, intelligence and trade relations. There are some fundamental questions that remain unanswered:
- What exactly is being recognised?
- How will this contribute to ending the war?
- Has it compelled Hamas to release the hostages, or has it emboldened them?
- Has it improved the safety and security of both Israelis and Palestinians?
- Has it disarmed Hamas, to prevent their violent suppression of its own people and their explicitly stated plans for the next October 7 massacre?
With little consideration for these fundamentals, it’s highly unlikely that a Palestinian state will be realised any time soon. Ironically, premature recognition is likely to lead to the prolonging of the war in Gaza, as Hamas have proven that terrorism is rewarded by the west.
Richard Pater, Director of BICOM


