What’s happened: The UK Government announced that it will recognise a Palestinian state at the UN General Assembly in September unless Israel fulfils a list of conditions to ameliorate the situation in Gaza. Malta joined the UK announcement, and several other states, including Australia and New Zealand, indicated they might be inclined to join the initiative.
- Speaking from Downing Street, Prime Minister Starmer said, “We are determined to protect the viability of the two-state solution, and so we will recognise the state of Palestine in September before UNGA; unless the Israeli government takes substantive steps to end the appalling situation in Gaza and commits to a long term sustainable peace, including through allowing the UN to restart without delay the supply of humanitarian support to the people of Gaza to end starvation, agreeing to a ceasefire, and making clear there will be no annexations in the West Bank. We will make an assessment ahead of UNGA on how far the parties have met these steps. No one side will have a veto on recognition through their actions or inactions.”
- At the United Nations, Foreign Secretary Lammy echoed the Prime Minister’s statement, including the conditions: “We will do it unless the Israeli government acts to end the appalling situation in Gaza, ends its military campaign and commits to a long-term sustainable peace based on a two-state solution.”
- Both Starmer and Lammy demanded that Hamas release hostages, cease fire, and have no role in the future governance of Gaza, but neither made acceding to these demands a condition for recognition or, for that matter, any British policy move.
- French Foreign Minister Jean-Noël Barrot praised the British announcement, saying “Together, through this momentous decision and our joint efforts, we are ending the infinite cycle of violence and re-opening the prospect of peace in the region.” It remains to be seen if indeed this decision has in fact ended the cycle of violence.
- The Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs said the decision “constitutes a reward for Hamas and harms efforts to achieve a ceasefire in Gaza and a framework for the release of the hostages.” Prime Minister Netanyahu posted on social media that “Starmer rewards Hamas’s monstrous terrorism & punishes its victims,” adding that “A jihadist state on Israel’s border TODAY will threaten Britain TOMORROW.”
- Opposition Leader Yair Lapid was more concerned with the lack of seriousness in the French and British recognition declarations. Recognising a Palestine state, he said, “won’t make it come into existence. The problem is that they don’t ask themselves the fundamental questions: Within what borders? What is its capital? What leadership does it have? What system of government? Is it a democracy? Does it support the right of return? Does it have the means to deal with an attempt by Hamas to take over right after it is established?”
- President Trump, for his part, said of the British decision, “If you do that, you really are rewarding Hamas, and I don’t think they should be rewarded.”
- The British announcement follows the French government’s pledge to recognise a Palestinian state at the UNGA in September, and a host of European initiatives designed to pressure Israel to halt the war in Gaza — even with Hamas still in power and the Israeli hostages still languishing in its tunnels. These include a possible move by the EU to suspend Israel from the Horizon Europe program, a large and generously funded development program for scientific and industrial research.
- Yedioth Ahronot reported that Israel and Germany are conducting intensive negotiations for a compromise that would see the Germans blocking such initiatives in exchange for Israel agreeing to an EU task force that would oversee compliance with EU demands regarding humanitarian aid into Gaza. Such a task force would determine if Israel has, as apparently agreed, doubled the entry of aid into Gaza or not, and if the task force is satisfied that it has, the various sanctions bruited would be suspended.
Context: Despite protestations from both the Prime Minister and the Foreign Secretary that “no one side will have a veto on recognition through their actions or inactions,” the stipulation that unless a ceasefire is agreed to the recognition will go forward grants just such a veto. All Hamas needs to do to ensure Britain recognises a Palestinian state is refuse to release any hostages. In fact, if Starmer and Lammy are taken at their word, any Hamas agreement now to even a partial hostage release and ceasefire would actually stymie the recognition effort.
- This isn’t just a theoretical argument, but a recapitulation writ large of the diplomatic developments of the last fortnight. On July 23, Hamas and Israel were to finally sign off on a ceasefire agreement which would have liberated ten of the twenty living Israeli hostages after months of painstaking negotiations. But on July 21, Lammy and 28 other Foreign Ministers issued a combative statement against Israel’s war effort essentially granting all of Hamas’ demands for free. Unsurprisingly, Hamas immediately scuppered the ceasefire talks, raising new demands on July 22, and the ceasefire and hostage release never came to pass.
- The recognition announcement follows weeks of intense pressure inside the Government and in Parliament for such a move, in both cases motivated more by anger at Israel than by any real assessment of the meaning of recognition or the dynamics of the conflict. States are normally recognised after they are founded. This recognition would be of a state that all acknowledge does not presently exist, even if many would very much like to see it come into being. For those so inclined, there is no reckoning with why exactly there isn’t a Palestinian state. Such a state could have been established at the end of the British Mandate following the UN partition resolution in 1947 or at any time during the Arab occupation of the West Bank and Gaza Strip between 1948 and 1967, but was not. It could have been established as a result of peace talks in 2000, 2001, 2008, 2014, but on each those occasions it was the Palestinians who rejected statehood because it could only be effected by a full reconciliation with a Jewish state next door.
- The Foreign Secretary’s statement at the UN yesterday included the sentence “Hamas must never be rewarded for its monstrous attack on October 7,” but there is no way of understanding the British policy as anything but such a reward, and indeed it was publicly welcomed by Hamas. What the Palestinians refused to accept in peace negotiations, the UK is endeavouring to grant them without peace and following the worst massacre of Jews since the Holocaust.
Looking ahead: Israel has not made any announcement of steps it might take in response to the French and British moves.
- Bezalel Smotrich, Finance Minister and leader of a far-right party in the Knesset pushed for a partial annexation of territory in Gaza. Even outside far-right and pro-settler circles in Israeli politics there have been voices calling for territorial losses to be used a lever to pressure Hamas.
- The thinking behind this is that Hamas is not moved by the difficult conditions of Gaza civilians — on the contrary, it sees only political gains when the humanitarian situation worsens — but that Hamas would be loath to loss territory.
- Sources in the Government poured cold water on the idea, with Shas leader Aryeh Deri reportedly saying in Cabinet yesterday that “We have nothing to look for in Gaza,” and another unnamed Minister telling Israeli media that the annexation idea is “not really on the table,” but rather just a threat to pressure Hamas.


