What’s happened: The US has reportedly circulated amongst its allies a draft of a Memorandum Of Understanding (MOU) with the main points of the possible ceasefire with Iran.
- Iran yesterday launched four one-way attack drones at commercial vessels as well as at US Navy ships. US fighter jets shot down all four drones and hit a fifth as it was being launched. Subsequently, the US also hit the drone control station in Bandar Abbas, the Iranian port on the Strait of Hormuz. Iran hit back with a drone attack on a US base in Kuwait.
- As with the air strike conducted earlier this week, US officials were keen to characterise this attack as both limited and defensive and not something which signals an end to the ceasefire that has been in effect since April 8.
- All this occurs on the backdrop of negotiations for a more comprehensive ceasefire which would see the opening of the Strait of Hormuz to maritime traffic and set a framework for Iran and the US to reach a detailed agreement on Iran’s nuclear programme. The ceasefire would last for sixty days, with a possibility of renewal if an agreement isn’t reached in time but the sides believe one is possible.
- In Lebanon, Hezbollah continues to launch deadly drone attack. The latest casualty was a 20 year old female solider Sgt. Rotem Yanai. Her death brings to 24 the number of Israeli soldiers killed in the war with Hezbollah, which began on March 2 this year. Four Israeli civilians have also been killed.
- Israel launched a wave of air strikes against Hezbollah targets in the Lebanese city of Tyre following the attack in northern Israel yesterday. The air strikes began two hours after the IDF issued evacuation orders for Tyre.
Context: The text of the MOU has not been reported publicly in full, and it was not entirely clear if the version that was circulated was already agreed to by both sides or just a US position paper on a likely agreement.
- Iranian state media also reported a draft of a 14-point MOU, though it was likewise unclear whether this was a version that had already been agreed to or an Iranian paper of what is assessed to be a likely point of agreement.
- It was widely understood in all versions that the agreement would call for an immediate opening of the Strait to maritime traffic, with an Iranian commitment to ensure a full restoration of commercial, but not military, traffic to prewar levels within one month of the agreement going into effect. The Iranian version also explicitly referenced US commitments for a limited withdrawal of US forces from the area also in the early stages of the ceasefire.
- The Iranians have also raised the issue of a joint venture with Oman to manage traffic across the Strait of Hormuz, and presumably to divide tolls levied on what has until now been an international waterway between the two countries.
- President Trump reacted angrily to the proposal to establish a mechanism of any kind for charging tolls, saying, “The strait is going to be open to everybody,” Trump declared on Tuesday. “Nobody’s going to control it. We’re going to watch over it. We’ll watch over it. But nobody’s going to control it.” When asked specifically about the possibility of Oman collaborating with Iran on the matter, he was even blunter, saying, “Oman will behave just like everybody else. Or else we’ll have to blow them up. They understand that. They’ll be fine.”
- Pakistan was the lead mediator for talks on the military issues and the blockade. The Iranian attempt to bring Oman onboard for its envisioned toll mechanism was conducted directly in talks in Muscat, Oman. But it is Doha, where talks are underway for a less noticed issue that appears to be the last major point of disagreement between the two sides.
- The Iranians are demanding at least a partial release of billions of dollars of frozen assets. The US has long had the position that this could only be discussed as part of a comprehensive diplomatic agreement that would end Iran’s nuclear programme, as well as hopefully also impose limitations on its ballistic missile programme and its support for regional proxies.
- The Iranians would like to see about $24 billion in frozen bank assets, roughly one fifth of the estimated total of frozen assets, unfrozen in the pending ceasefire deal. The US has consistently refused to consider this as part of an early phase of any ceasefire, for fear of granting the Islamist regime a lifeline that it could use to its own benefit should the ceasefire fall apart or no later agreement be reached.
- In Doha, the Iranians are demanding $12 billion to be unfrozen upfront, including $6 billion held in Qatar, right at the beginning of the ceasefire — in other words, the Iranians would get the money just for opening the Strait which was open before the war, without even yet agreeing to limitations on their nuclear programme, which, if agreed, would only come sixty days later.
Looking ahead: The Knesset is due to vote on Monday on a bill to dissolve parliament and set early elections. Elections are currently scheduled for October 27, and, since there is a minimum 90-day period between dissolution and general elections, the only possible dates for an early election would not be all that early — sometime in September or October of this year.
- The issue that led to the current coalition’s fracture was the attempt to enshrine into law the ongoing exemption from conscription enjoyed by Haredi men that has been ruled illegal by the Supreme Court under current law.
- Though it is now clear that no such legislation will pass in the current parliament, the issue still causes ruptures on the legislation that the coalition remains committed to passing before dissolution.
- Yesterday, a controversial bill to undo the cancelling of daycare subsidies for children of fathers who did not serve in the military passed after an unusual threat by ultra-Orthodox lawmakers against Prime Minister Netanyahu and the Likud party he leads. The bill was not initially supported by the Likud, whose voter base strongly opposes the measure. The ultra-Orthodox UTJ party threatened that if the Likud did not vote for the bill, they would support the establishment of a State Commission of Inquiry into the security failures leading to October 7, something all the opposition parties (and huge majorities of the Israeli public) support.
- The current Government opposes such a Commission as it argues that the appointment mechanism, which relies on Supreme Court judges, would bias any Commission it forms against it. At the last minute, Likud lawmakers, with one exception, supported the bill, and it passed.
