What’s happening: In a speech on Sunday, Prime Minister Netanyahu said Israel would not allow Islamist forces who control Syria or the new Syrian army being formed to “enter the area south of Damascus” adding that Israel demands “the complete demilitarisation of southern Syria in the provinces of Quneitra, Deraa and Suweida from the forces of the new regime.”

• Netanyahu also discussed the Druze community, that is located both in the Israel controlled Golan and in southern Syria, emphasising that Israel would “not tolerate any threat to the Druze community in southern Syria.”
• Several Druze militias that have formed in the Suwayda district of Syria announced yesterday they would be opening a joint operations headquarters to allow them to facilitate security and stability in the Jabel Druze area. Their aim is to function as an independent military force separate from the Syrian army. 
• Defence Minister Katz said the IDF would remain in the buffer zone on the Syrian side of the Golan “for an indefinite period of time to protect our communities and thwart any threat.”
• In related news, the IDF announced that troops continue “defensive operations” and have completed dozens of targeted raids, during which they located, confiscated, and dismantled various weapons that pose a threat to Israel. During one of the raids last week, soldiers located rifles, ammunition, and other military equipment left behind by the old Syrian regime forces. All findings were either confiscated or dismantled.
• Netanyahu and Katz’s comments come as Syria’s transitional government has organised a national dialogue conference aimed at shaping the post-Assad future of the country.

Lebanon: In Lebanon on Sunday, tens of thousands of people, mainly from Lebanon’s Shia community, attended the funeral of former Hezbollah Secretary General Hassan Nasrallah in Beirut. Senior Hezbollah official Ali Daamoush told reporters that about 800 personalities from 65 countries would be attending.

• Notable however was the absence of significant Lebanese political figures and those from the Arab world.
• Nasrallah’s successor Naim Qassem delivered a speech from a remote location announcing a ‘new stage’ in the group’s battle against Israel. “We will not submit and we will not accept the continuation of our killing and occupation while we watch,”
• IAF combat planes that flew over Beirut during the funeral Israel’s Defense Minister Katz said it was meant to “deliver a clear message: Those who threaten and attack Israel will meet the same fate.”
• Israel also carried out several airstrikes in Lebanon, targeting Hezbollah sites containing rocket launchers and other weapons in the area of Baalbek and several additional areas in southern Lebanon.

Context: Nasrallah, who had led Hezbollah for over 30 years, was killed by Israel in late September 2024 after more than 80 bombs were dropped on the group’s main operations room.

• While his funeral was intended by Hezbollah as a show of force and to prove it enjoys broad support within Lebanon for its resistance against Israel, the attendance (and lack of attendance) actually signified the current weakness of Hezbollah. The Lebanese government sent the labor minister – a Hezbollah representative – but President Aoun did not attend the event. During the ceremony Aoun’s office issued a statement that implicitly criticised Hezbollah decision to go to war against Israel, saying in a meeting with the Iranian delegation that “Lebanon is weary of others’ wars.”
• One person who did attend the funeral was anti-Zionist professor David Miller who works for Iranian state-owned Press TV. Miller shared a video online of himself in Beirut.
• The IAF jets were intended to mock Nasrallah’s legacy.  In the years before his death, Nasrallah had several times boasted that the IDF could not do as it pleased in Lebanon, and that any attack on a Lebanese or a non-Lebanese national would come with a price. 
• The video Naim Qassem broadcast (rather than attending in person) suggests he fears for his life.
• While Qassem announced a “new stage,” his remarks indicate Hezbollah would maintain the cautious stance it has taken since the ceasefire far. He qualified his pledge to continue “resistance” by adding the words “at the right time,” adding that Israel’s failure to uphold the agreement needed to result in the state’s intervention.
• Iran continues to try and arm Hezbollah. Under the terms of the ceasefire agreement Israel can and will continue to monitor Hezbollah activity and maintain freedom to act if the threat is considered imminent. Recently Israel warned the control room at Beirut airport not to let an Iranian commercial airliner land as intelligence had identified it as transporting funds destined for Hezbollah. 
• Following the ceasefire between Israel and Hezbollah Israel has now redeployed from all Lebanese villages, and all of Lebanese territory apart from five outposts close to the border. President Aoun has been quoted in Lebanese media saying, “the option of war is not helpful and we will act using diplomatic means.”
• While Syria does not currently pose a threat to Israel, the working assumption is that internal tensions and rivalries between the religious and ideological groups might erupt at some point, as might the ingrained hatred of Israel. 
• Israel is concerned about the establishment of anti-Israel militias near the border with Israel. Syria’s leader Al-Jolani might have no intention of attacking Israel, but it still remains to be seen how he will be able to control Syria in the medium term. Moreover, the disproportionate influence of Turkey and its President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan – who has said that the day would come when he and his troops would clash with Israel – also stokes Israeli fears of such a scenario.

Looking ahead: The proposals of the Syrian National Dialogue will be considered by a new transitional government that is set to take power on March 1.

• The Kurdish-led Autonomous Administration of North and East Syria and other Kurdish representatives have declined participation, citing concerns over the inclusiveness and legitimacy of the conference.